Adopt the common data, the family of solutions, the standing hypotheses, hypotheses (I), (I′) and (CB), the notion of an admissible parameter vector, and the real number V0 of the asymptotic lower bound theorem: in particular the stationary mean-field triple(S,A,P), the aggregate fluctuation covarianceΘ with Θt⋆=Θ(St,At), the matrices Et, Bt, Vt, Rt and Wt=ZtBt+21Vt of the completion-of-squares theorem together with its hypotheses (H1), with constant r>0, and (H2), with Riccati family Z, and, for each natural numberN≥1, the solution, carried by the N-agent driving system of the family, written (Ωag,Fag,Pag) here, with expectationE (its probability measure is written Pag because P is the co-state of the triple), with regular event Ω0, empirical state measure Σ, observation recordW with values in the observation record space(RT,RT) with horizon T and l~ channels, l~ being the number of channels of the observation-rate family β~ of the common data, observation filtration (Gt)t∈[0,T], fluctuation processess and a, and recentred cost JN. Assume:
(I0) (Vanishing initial covariance.) The matrix Π0 of hypothesis (I) is the zero matrix.
and, for t∈[0,T], the filtering errorεt with components εtγ=stγ−E[stγ∣Gt], formed from any choice of conditional expectations; each stγ is bounded in absolute value by 2N, any two points of the probability simplex being at Euclidean distance at most 2, and is therefore square-integrable. For an admissible parameter vector π and the N-th solution write K, t0,…,tK, ut=at+Rt−1Wt⊤st, Tk(s), Tknr(s) and Tkfr(s) for the block count, the block endpoints, the process u, the tracked events, the near-field tracked events and the far-field tracked events of the ledger lemma formed from π, and adopt from that lemma also its constant Λ⋆, the near-field radius ϱ (a component of π), the level sum Υlev, the tracked energy Z of its setting paragraph and the quantity P of its derived-quantities paragraph, both finite by its claim 1; adopt from part (a) of the asymptotic lower bound theorem the real number Z♯(π). By claim 2 of the ledger lemma Tknr(s)∈Gs for k∈{0,…,K−1} and s∈[tk,T]. Adopt from the ledger lemma also the realized mean-field flow Φ and the noise majorant Q≥0 with E[Q4]≤cQκ0N−2. These are the objects of the pre-stopping envelope lemma for the instance fixed in the block cascade lemma, which is the instance of the extended good-set stopping-time lemma with base point x0=S0: there Φt(ω)=St(x0,α^(ω)) for the realized control α^ of the N-th solution and the two-argument mean-field flow St(⋅,⋅) of the flow stability lemma, and Q=M+ΛbeΛbTI+eΛbTN−1/2∣s0∣ is formed from the martingale part of the N-th solution, its integral I, the initial fluctuation s0, the constant Λb and T. Neither formula involves a component of π, so Φ and Q are the same for every admissible π. For t∈[0,T] define the observation-centred fluctuation
Notational points: the near-field radius ϱ is unrelated to the certificate measure ϱ0 of hypothesis (VT′) below; the tolerances ϵ of (VT′) and η of claims 2 and 3 are free real numbers, not the components ϵ and η of π (of the components of π, only the near-field radius ϱ is named in this statement); the certificate vectors α, z, a1,…,ad of (VT′) are unrelated to the realized control α^ and to the control process; the certificate random variables of (VT′) are written ϑ1,…,ϑd, so that the letter Θ is reserved for the covariance matrices Θ, Θ⋆ and Θ~⋆ of the fluctuation LQG data; the certificate map G of (VT′) is unrelated to the terminal cost G of the population cost data; the certificate density p of (VT′) is a function on Rd×Y, unrelated to the co-state P; the certificate probability space (Ω′,F′,P′) of (VT′) is a space distinct from the driving system, with its own expectation and mean-square norm; πs with a time subscript is a prefix map, unrelated to the parameter vector π; Wt with a time subscript is the matrix ZtBt+21Vt, while W and W(s) without a time subscript are the observation record and its prefix; P0 in the instantiation of the Riccati theorem below is the name of the initial-value datum of that theorem, not the co-state at time 0; the letter G of the van Trees items cited in (C2′) denotes their data-space σ-algebra (played here by Y), not the observation filtration; and the variable written X′ in Factorisation of Random Variables Through a Measurable Map, the Variational Form of the Mean-Square Filtering Error, and Its Invariance Under the Joint Law is that lemma's second-space random variable, unrelated to the observation-centred fluctuation Xt′. Write 1H for the indicator of an event H, x⋅y for the dot product on the Euclidean spaceRl, Mx for the matrix-vector product, MM′ for the matrix product, M⊤ for the transpose, and ∫I⋅ds for the Lebesgue integral over a compact interval.
Observation data. Let (U~,β~ˉ) be a twice continuously differentiable extension of the observation-rate family β~ of the common data, with l~ observation channels, let b~ be the aggregate observation drift of β~, and let E~t and Θ~t⋆ be the observation matrix and the observation noise covariance of the fluctuation LQG data of (S,A,P) relative to these extensions, so that Θ~t⋆ is the diagonal matrix with diagonal entries b~υ(St), υ∈{1,…,l~}. The state matrix Et of those data coincides with Et, and their state noise covariance with Θt⋆, by the identical defining formulas. Assume:
(OC) (Observation regularity and positivity.) Every entry of t↦E~t and every function t↦b~υ(St) is continuous on [0,T], and there is a real β~min>0 with b~υ(St)≥β~min for every t∈[0,T] and every υ. (Throughout, a real-valued function on a subinterval I of the real numbersR is called continuous on I when it is continuous relative to I, both I and the codomain R carrying the metric of the real line.)
is a real matrix with l rows and l columns. Let Π=(Πt)t∈[0,T] be the solution of the Kalman covariance Riccati equation on [0,T] with the data A=E, C=Θ⋆, D=D~ and initial value P0=Π0, the matrix of hypothesis (I); claim 1 below verifies that this theorem applies.
Injection profiles. Let λ be an assignment of a vector λ(u)∈Rl to each u∈[0,T], with continuous components (a profile). Let ψλ be the unique assignment with continuous components such that
Moreover, for every real number s with 0<s≤T, every c∈Rl, every profile λ and every real number ϵ>0 there is a natural number N2 such that for every natural number N≥N2 there exist: a probability space(Ω′,F′,P′); a set Y∈Rs with its trace σ-algebra Y={E∈Rs:E⊆Y} (a σ-algebra on Y by claim 1 of Assembly of Measure Spaces: Restriction, Transport, One-Point Spaces, and Countable Disjoint Unions) and a σ-finite measureϱ0 on (Y,Y); a natural number d≥1; square-integrable random variables ϑ1,…,ϑd on (Ω′,F′,P′), collected in ϑ=(ϑ1,…,ϑd); a map D′:Ω′→Y measurable with respect to F′ and Y; a square-integrable random variable X† on (Ω′,F′,P′); a function p:Rd×Y→[0,∞); a map G:Y→R; and vectors α, z, a1,…,ad in Euclidean spaceRd, such that:
(a) (Law identity.) The pair (X†,D′), with D′ regarded as Rs-valued, is measurable with respect to F′ and B(R)⊗Rs, the pair (c⋅Xs′,W(s)) is measurable with respect to Fag and B(R)⊗Rs, c⋅Xs′ is square-integrable on (Ωag,Fag,Pag), and the image measure of P′ under (X†,D′) equals the image measure of Pag under (c⋅Xs′,W(s)) on B(R)⊗Rs.
(C1) (Factorisation through the record.)σ(D′)={D′−1(E):E∈Y}, and every random variable on (Ω′,F′,P′) that is measurable with respect to σ(D′) and square-integrable equals g∘D′ for some g:Y→R measurable with respect to Y and B(R), for which g∘D′ is then square-integrable.
Hypothesis (VT′) makes no reference to π or to the blocks: it certifies, on a copy (Ω′,F′,P′) carrying the joint law of (c⋅Xs′,W(s)), the estimand c⋅Xs′ on the whole sample space, and the localization to the near-field tracked events is carried out in the proof of claim 3 by means of the fourth-moment bound of claim 2. The time s=0 is excluded from (VT′); at s=0 claim 2 rests on (I0) alone.
(MS) (Measurability of the tracked energy density.) For every natural number N≥1, every admissible parameter vector π and every k∈{0,…,K−1}, the function
s⟼E[1Tknr(s)us⋅Rsus]
is measurable on [tk,tk+1] for the trace Borel σ-algebra of that interval, and so are the functions s↦E[1−1Tk(s)] and s↦E[1Tkfr(s)]. The integrals of these three functions over [tk,tk+1] are the k-th summands of claim 7 and of claims 1(d) and 1(c) of the ledger lemma, so (MS) records what the writing of those claims already presupposes.
Then the following hold.
1. (The Kalman covariance is well defined.)Π0 is symmetric positive semidefinite; every entry of E, of Θ⋆ and of D~ is continuous on [0,T]; and every Θt⋆ and every D~t is positive semidefinite. Consequently Π exists, is unique, has continuous entries, and every Πt is symmetric positive semidefinite. Moreover every Ξt is symmetric positive semidefinite with entries continuous on [0,T], and the function
s⟼γ=1∑lδ=1∑lΞsγδΠsγδ
is continuous, nonnegative and Lebesgue integrable on [0,T].
2. (Pointwise filtering bound.) Let s∈[0,T]. Then for every N≥1 the components of Xs′−ss are Gs-measurable, so that εsγ is almost surely equal to Xs′γ−E[Xs′γ∣Gs] for every choice of the conditional expectations, and
E[∣Xs′∣4]≤cQκ♯,
with ∣Xs′∣2=∑γ(Xs′γ)2. Moreover, for every c∈Rl and every real η>0 there is a natural number N3 such that for every N≥N3
E[γ=1∑lδ=1∑lcγcδεsγεsδ]≥c⋅(Πsc)−η.
3. (The filtering term.) Let π be an admissible parameter vector satisfying the absorption condition of part (a) of the asymptotic lower bound theorem, and let η>0 be real. Then there is a natural number N4 such that for every N≥N4
Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.