Reason: First version. Under injection certificates (VT), observation regularity (OC) and the measurability hypothesis (MS), the filtering term retained in the published asymptotic lower bound is asymptotically at least the integral of Xi against the Kalman covariance, giving liminf J_N >= the fluctuation LQG value for every observation-driven policy family.
Statement
Adopt the common data, the family of solutions, the standing hypotheses, hypotheses (I), (I′) and (CB), the notion of an admissible parameter vector, and the real number V0 of the asymptotic lower bound theorem: in particular the stationary mean-field triple(S,A,P), the aggregate fluctuation covarianceΘ with Θt⋆=Θ(St,At), the matrices Et, Bt, Vt, Rt and Wt=ZtBt+21Vt of the completion-of-squares theorem together with its hypotheses (H1), with constant r>0, and (H2), with Riccati family Z, and, for each natural numberN≥1, the solution with regular event Ω0, empirical state measure Σ, observation filtration (Gt)t∈[0,T], fluctuation processess and a, and recentred cost JN.
and, for t∈[0,T], the filtering errorεt with components εtγ=stγ−E[stγ∣Gt], formed from any choice of conditional expectations; each stγ is bounded in absolute value by 2N, any two points of the probability simplex being at Euclidean distance at most 2, and is therefore square-integrable. For an admissible parameter vector π and the N-th solution write K, t0,…,tK, ut=at+Rt−1Wt⊤st and Tknr(s) for the block count, the block endpoints, the process u and the near-field tracked events of the ledger lemma formed from π; by claim 2 of that lemma Tknr(s)∈Gs for k∈{0,…,K−1} and s∈[tk,T]. Write E for the expectation, 1H for the indicator of an event H, x⋅y for the dot product on the Euclidean spaceRl, Mx for the matrix-vector product, MM′ for the matrix product, M⊤ for the transpose, and ∫I⋅ds for the Lebesgue integral over a compact interval.
Observation data. Let (U~,β~ˉ) be a twice continuously differentiable extension of the observation-rate family β~ of the common data, with l~ observation channels, let b~ be the aggregate observation drift of β~, and let E~t and Θ~t⋆ be the observation matrix and the observation noise covariance of the fluctuation LQG data of (S,A,P) relative to these extensions, so that Θ~t⋆ is the diagonal matrix with diagonal entries b~υ(St), υ∈{1,…,l~}. The state matrix Et of those data coincides with Et, and their state noise covariance with Θt⋆, by the identical defining formulas. Assume:
(OC) (Observation regularity and positivity.) Every entry of t↦E~t and every function t↦b~υ(St) is continuous on [0,T], and there is a real β~min>0 with b~υ(St)≥β~min for every t∈[0,T] and every υ. (Throughout, a real-valued function on a subinterval I of the real numbersR is called continuous on I when it is continuous relative to I, both I and the codomain R carrying the metric of the real line.)
is a real matrix with l rows and l columns. Let Π=(Πt)t∈[0,T] be the solution of the Kalman covariance Riccati equation on [0,T] with the data A=E, C=Θ⋆, D=D~ and initial value P0=Π0, the matrix of hypothesis (I); claim 1 below verifies that this theorem applies.
Injection profiles. Let λ be an assignment of a vector λ(u)∈Rl to each u∈[0,T], with continuous components. Let ψλ be the unique assignment with continuous components such that
(VT) (Injection certificates.) For every s∈[0,T], every c∈Rl, every λ as above, every admissible parameter vector π, every k∈{0,…,K−1} with s∈[tk,tk+1], and every real ϵ>0, there is a natural number N2 such that for every N≥N2 there are, on the probability space of the N-th solution, data d, (Y,Y), ϱ0, D, Θ1,…,Θd, α and z, with z nonzero, satisfying conditions (C1), (C2) and (C3) of Localized Filtering Lower Bound from a van Trees Certificate for the tuple X=ss, the sub-σ-algebra Gs, the event H=Tknr(s), the vector c and the tolerance ϵ, and satisfying moreover, with I the van Trees information matrix of (C2),
α⋅z≥c⋅ψλ(s)−ϵandz⋅(Iz)≤As(λ)+ϵ.
(MS) (Measurability of the tracked energy density.) For every natural number N≥1, every admissible parameter vector π and every k∈{0,…,K−1}, the function
s⟼E[1Tknr(s)us⋅Rsus]
is measurable on [tk,tk+1] for the trace Borel σ-algebra of that interval. Its integral over [tk,tk+1] is the k-th summand of claim 7 of the ledger lemma, so (MS) records what the writing of that claim already presupposes.
Then the following hold.
1. (The Kalman covariance is well defined.)Π0 is symmetric positive semidefinite; every entry of E, of Θ⋆ and of D~ is continuous on [0,T]; and every Θt⋆ and every D~t is positive semidefinite. Consequently Π exists, is unique, has continuous entries, and every Πt is symmetric positive semidefinite. Moreover every Ξt is symmetric positive semidefinite with entries continuous on [0,T], and the function
s⟼γ=1∑lδ=1∑lΞsγδΠsγδ
is continuous, nonnegative and Lebesgue integrable on [0,T].
2. (Pointwise filtering bound.) Let π be an admissible parameter vector, let k∈{0,…,K−1}, let s∈[tk,tk+1], let c∈Rl and let η>0 be real. Then there is a natural number N3 such that for every N≥N3
E[1Tknr(s)γ=1∑lδ=1∑lcγcδεsγεsδ]≥c⋅(Πsc)−η.
3. (The filtering term.) Let π be an admissible parameter vector and let η>0 be real. Then there is a natural number N4 such that for every N≥N4
Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.