TheoremBase

Asymptotic Lower Bound for the Recentred N-Agent Cost by the Fluctuation LQG Value, under Law-Transported Injection Certificates

Statement

Adopt the common data, the family of solutions, the standing hypotheses, hypotheses (I), (I′') and (CB), the notion of an admissible parameter vector, and the real number V0V_{0} of the asymptotic lower bound theorem: in particular the stationary mean-field triple (S,A,P)(S,A,P), the aggregate fluctuation covariance Θ\Theta with Θt⋆=Θ(St,At)\Theta^{\star}_{t}=\Theta(S_{t},A_{t}), the matrices EtE_{t}, Bt\mathsf{B}_{t}, VtV_{t}, RtR_{t} and Wt=ZtBt+12VtW_{t}=Z_{t}\mathsf{B}_{t}+\tfrac{1}{2}V_{t} of the completion-of-squares theorem together with its hypotheses (H1), with constant r>0r>0, and (H2), with Riccati family ZZ, and, for each natural number N≥1N\ge1, the solution, carried by the NN-agent driving system of the family, written (Ωag,Fag,Pag)(\Omega^{\mathrm{ag}},\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{ag}},P^{\mathrm{ag}}) here, with expectation E\mathbb{E} (its probability measure is written PagP^{\mathrm{ag}} because PP is the co-state of the triple), with regular event Ω0\Omega_{0}, empirical state measure Σ\Sigma, observation record WW with values in the observation record space (RT,RT)(\mathbf{R}_{T},\mathcal{R}_{T}) with horizon TT and l~\tilde{l} channels, l~\tilde{l} being the number of channels of the observation-rate family β~\tilde{\beta} of the common data, observation filtration (Gt)t∈[0,T](\mathcal{G}_{t})_{t\in[0,T]}, fluctuation processes s\mathfrak{s} and a\mathfrak{a}, and recentred cost JN\mathcal{J}_{N}. Assume:

(I0) (Vanishing initial covariance.) The matrix Π0\Pi_{0} of hypothesis (I) is the zero matrix.

Adopt also, from the cascade filtering lemma, the matrices

Ξt=WtRt−1Wt⊤(t∈[0,T])\Xi_{t}=W_{t}R_{t}^{-1}W_{t}^{\top}\qquad(t\in[0,T])

and, for t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T], the filtering error εt\varepsilon_{t} with components εtγ=stγ−E[stγ∣Gt]\varepsilon^{\gamma}_{t}=\mathfrak{s}^{\gamma}_{t}-\mathbb{E}[\mathfrak{s}^{\gamma}_{t}\mid\mathcal{G}_{t}], formed from any choice of conditional expectations; each stγ\mathfrak{s}^{\gamma}_{t} is bounded in absolute value by 2N2\sqrt{N}, any two points of the probability simplex being at Euclidean distance at most 22, and is therefore square-integrable. For an admissible parameter vector π\pi and the NN-th solution write KK, t0,…,tKt_{0},\dots,t_{K}, ut=at+Rt−1Wt⊤stu_{t}=\mathfrak{a}_{t}+R_{t}^{-1}W_{t}^{\top}\mathfrak{s}_{t}, Tk(s)\mathcal{T}_{k}(s), Tknr(s)\mathcal{T}^{\mathrm{nr}}_{k}(s) and Tkfr(s)\mathcal{T}^{\mathrm{fr}}_{k}(s) for the block count, the block endpoints, the process uu, the tracked events, the near-field tracked events and the far-field tracked events of the ledger lemma formed from π\pi, and adopt from that lemma also its constant Λ⋆\Lambda_{\star}, the near-field radius ϱ\varrho (a component of π\pi), the level sum Υlev\Upsilon_{\mathrm{lev}}, the tracked energy Z\mathcal{Z} of its setting paragraph and the quantity P\mathcal{P} of its derived-quantities paragraph, both finite by its claim 1; adopt from part (a) of the asymptotic lower bound theorem the real number Z♯(π)\mathcal{Z}^{\sharp}(\pi). By claim 2 of the ledger lemma Tknr(s)∈Gs\mathcal{T}^{\mathrm{nr}}_{k}(s)\in\mathcal{G}_{s} for k∈{0,…,K−1}k\in\{0,\dots,K-1\} and s∈[tk,T]s\in[t_{k},T]. Adopt from the ledger lemma also the realized mean-field flow Φ\Phi and the noise majorant Q≥0Q\ge0 with E[Q4]≤cQκ0N−2\mathbb{E}[Q^{4}]\le c_{Q}\kappa_{0}N^{-2}. These are the objects of the pre-stopping envelope lemma for the instance fixed in the block cascade lemma, which is the instance of the extended good-set stopping-time lemma with base point x0=S0x_{0}=S_{0}: there Φt(ω)=St(x0,α^(ω))\Phi_{t}(\omega)=S_{t}(x_{0},\hat{\alpha}(\omega)) for the realized control α^\hat{\alpha} of the NN-th solution and the two-argument mean-field flow St(⋅,⋅)S_{t}(\cdot,\cdot) of the flow stability lemma, and Q=M‾+ΛbeΛbTI+eΛbTN−1/2∣s0∣Q=\overline{M}+\Lambda_{b}e^{\Lambda_{b}T}I+e^{\Lambda_{b}T}N^{-1/2}|\mathfrak{s}_{0}| is formed from the martingale part of the NN-th solution, its integral II, the initial fluctuation s0\mathfrak{s}_{0}, the constant Λb\Lambda_{b} and TT. Neither formula involves a component of π\pi, so Φ\Phi and QQ are the same for every admissible π\pi. For t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T] define the observation-centred fluctuation

Xt′=N (Σt−Φt)=st−N (Φt−St),X'_{t}=\sqrt{N}\,(\Sigma_{t}-\Phi_{t})=\mathfrak{s}_{t}-\sqrt{N}\,(\Phi_{t}-S_{t}),

with components Xt′γ=stγ−N(Φtγ−Stγ)X'^{\gamma}_{t}=\mathfrak{s}^{\gamma}_{t}-\sqrt{N}(\Phi^{\gamma}_{t}-S^{\gamma}_{t}). Each Xt′γX'^{\gamma}_{t} is a random variable, stγ\mathfrak{s}^{\gamma}_{t} being one and Φtγ\Phi^{\gamma}_{t} being Gt\mathcal{G}_{t}-measurable by claim 3 of the realized-flow adaptedness lemma, and is square-integrable: by The Empirical State Measure Deviates from the Realized Mean-Field Flow by at Most the Noise Majorant one has (Xt′γ)2≤∣Xt′∣2≤N Q2≤N (1+Q4)(X'^{\gamma}_{t})^{2}\le|X'_{t}|^{2}\le N\,Q^{2}\le N\,(1+Q^{4}) on Ω0\Omega_{0}, hence almost surely, Ω0\Omega_{0} having probability one, and E[Q4]≤cQκ0N−2<∞\mathbb{E}[Q^{4}]\le c_{Q}\kappa_{0}N^{-2}<\infty, so that E[(Xt′γ)2]≤N(1+E[Q4])\mathbb{E}[(X'^{\gamma}_{t})^{2}]\le N(1+\mathbb{E}[Q^{4}]) by monotonicity of the integral (a crude bound, used only to establish square-integrability; claim 2 gives an NN-uniform bound).

Record prefixes. For a real number ss with 0<s≤T0<s\le T let (Rs,Rs)(\mathbf{R}_{s},\mathcal{R}_{s}) be the observation record space with horizon ss and l~\tilde{l} channels (for s=Ts=T this is the space named above), let πs:RT→Rs\pi_{s}:\mathbf{R}_{T}\to\mathbf{R}_{s} be the prefix map when s<Ts<T and the identity map of RT\mathbf{R}_{T} when s=Ts=T, and put W(s)=πs∘WW^{(s)}=\pi_{s}\circ W, the record prefix, a map from Ωag\Omega^{\mathrm{ag}} to Rs\mathbf{R}_{s}. Write B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) for the Borel σ\sigma-algebra of the real line, ⊗\otimes for the product σ\sigma-algebra, ∥⋅∥2\lVert\cdot\rVert_{2} for the mean-square norm on the probability space indicated, and measurability and image measures as in those items. For a map D′\mathsf{D}' from a set Ω′\Omega' into Rs\mathbf{R}_{s} write σ(D′)={D′−1(E):E∈Rs}\sigma(\mathsf{D}')=\{\mathsf{D}'^{-1}(E):E\in\mathcal{R}_{s}\}, as in Factorisation of Random Variables Through a Measurable Map, the Variational Form of the Mean-Square Filtering Error, and Its Invariance Under the Joint Law.

Notational points: the near-field radius ϱ\varrho is unrelated to the certificate measure ϱ0\varrho_{0} of hypothesis (VT′') below; the tolerances ϵ\epsilon of (VT′') and η\eta of claims 2 and 3 are free real numbers, not the components ϵ\epsilon and η\eta of π\pi (of the components of π\pi, only the near-field radius ϱ\varrho is named in this statement); the certificate vectors α\alpha, zz, a1,…,ada_{1},\dots,a_{d} of (VT′') are unrelated to the realized control α^\hat{\alpha} and to the control process; the certificate random variables of (VT′') are written ϑ1,…,ϑd\vartheta_{1},\dots,\vartheta_{d}, so that the letter Θ\Theta is reserved for the covariance matrices Θ\Theta, Θ⋆\Theta^{\star} and Θ~⋆\tilde{\Theta}^{\star} of the fluctuation LQG data; the certificate map GG of (VT′') is unrelated to the terminal cost GG of the population cost data; the certificate density pp of (VT′') is a function on Rd×Y\mathbb{R}^{d}\times\mathsf{Y}, unrelated to the co-state PP; the certificate probability space (Ω′,F′,P′)(\Omega',\mathcal{F}',P') of (VT′') is a space distinct from the driving system, with its own expectation and mean-square norm; πs\pi_{s} with a time subscript is a prefix map, unrelated to the parameter vector π\pi; WtW_{t} with a time subscript is the matrix ZtBt+12VtZ_{t}\mathsf{B}_{t}+\tfrac12V_{t}, while WW and W(s)W^{(s)} without a time subscript are the observation record and its prefix; P0P_{0} in the instantiation of the Riccati theorem below is the name of the initial-value datum of that theorem, not the co-state at time 00; the letter G\mathcal{G} of the van Trees items cited in (C2′') denotes their data-space σ\sigma-algebra (played here by Y\mathcal{Y}), not the observation filtration; and the variable written X′X' in Factorisation of Random Variables Through a Measurable Map, the Variational Form of the Mean-Square Filtering Error, and Its Invariance Under the Joint Law is that lemma's second-space random variable, unrelated to the observation-centred fluctuation Xt′X'_{t}. Write 1H\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{H}} for the indicator of an event H\mathcal{H}, x⋅yx\cdot y for the dot product on the Euclidean space Rl\mathbb{R}^{l}, MxMx for the matrix-vector product, MM′MM' for the matrix product, M⊤M^{\top} for the transpose, and ∫I⋅ ds\int_{I}\cdot\,ds for the Lebesgue integral over a compact interval.

Observation data. Let (U~,β~ˉ)(\tilde{U},\bar{\tilde{\beta}}) be a twice continuously differentiable extension of the observation-rate family β~\tilde{\beta} of the common data, with l~\tilde{l} observation channels, let b~\tilde{b} be the aggregate observation drift of β~\tilde{\beta}, and let E~t\tilde{\mathcal{E}}_{t} and Θ~t⋆\tilde{\Theta}^{\star}_{t} be the observation matrix and the observation noise covariance of the fluctuation LQG data of (S,A,P)(S,A,P) relative to these extensions, so that Θ~t⋆\tilde{\Theta}^{\star}_{t} is the diagonal matrix with diagonal entries b~υ(St)\tilde{b}^{\upsilon}(S_{t}), υ∈{1,…,l~}\upsilon\in\{1,\dots,\tilde{l}\}. The state matrix Et\mathcal{E}_{t} of those data coincides with EtE_{t}, and their state noise covariance with Θt⋆\Theta^{\star}_{t}, by the identical defining formulas. Assume:

(OC) (Observation regularity and positivity.) Every entry of t↦E~tt\mapsto\tilde{\mathcal{E}}_{t} and every function t↦b~υ(St)t\mapsto\tilde{b}^{\upsilon}(S_{t}) is continuous on [0,T][0,T], and there is a real β~min⁡>0\tilde{\beta}_{\min}>0 with b~υ(St)≥β~min⁡\tilde{b}^{\upsilon}(S_{t})\ge\tilde{\beta}_{\min} for every t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T] and every υ\upsilon. (Throughout, a real-valued function on a subinterval II of the real numbers R\mathbb{R} is called continuous on II when it is continuous relative to II, both II and the codomain R\mathbb{R} carrying the metric of the real line.)

Under (OC) each Θ~t⋆\tilde{\Theta}^{\star}_{t} is invertible and

D~t=E~t⊤ (Θ~t⋆)−1 E~t(t∈[0,T])\tilde{D}_{t}=\tilde{\mathcal{E}}_{t}^{\top}\,(\tilde{\Theta}^{\star}_{t})^{-1}\,\tilde{\mathcal{E}}_{t}\qquad(t\in[0,T])

is a real matrix with ll rows and ll columns. Let Π=(Πt)t∈[0,T]\Pi=(\Pi_{t})_{t\in[0,T]} be the solution of the Kalman covariance Riccati equation on [0,T][0,T] with the data A=EA=\mathcal{E}, C=Θ⋆C=\Theta^{\star}, D=D~D=\tilde{D} and initial value P0=Π0P_{0}=\Pi_{0}, the matrix of hypothesis (I); claim 1 below verifies that this theorem applies.

Injection profiles. Let λ\lambda be an assignment of a vector λ(u)∈Rl\lambda(u)\in\mathbb{R}^{l} to each u∈[0,T]u\in[0,T], with continuous components (a profile). Let ψλ\psi_{\lambda} be the unique assignment with continuous components such that

ψλ(u)=Π0λ(0)+∫[0,u](Erψλ(r)+Θr⋆λ(r)) dr(0≤u≤T),\psi_{\lambda}(u)=\Pi_{0}\lambda(0)+\int_{[0,u]}\bigl(\mathcal{E}_{r}\psi_{\lambda}(r)+\Theta^{\star}_{r}\lambda(r)\bigr)\,dr\qquad(0\le u\le T),

which exists and is unique by claim 3 of the variation of constants theorem, and for s∈[0,T]s\in[0,T] put

As(λ)=λ(0)⋅(Π0λ(0))+∫[0,s](λ(r)⋅(Θr⋆λ(r))+ψλ(r)⋅(D~rψλ(r))) dr.\mathcal{A}_{s}(\lambda)=\lambda(0)\cdot\bigl(\Pi_{0}\lambda(0)\bigr)+\int_{[0,s]}\Bigl(\lambda(r)\cdot\bigl(\Theta^{\star}_{r}\lambda(r)\bigr)+\psi_{\lambda}(r)\cdot\bigl(\tilde{D}_{r}\psi_{\lambda}(r)\bigr)\Bigr)\,dr .

Under (I0) the terms Π0λ(0)\Pi_{0}\lambda(0) and λ(0)⋅(Π0λ(0))\lambda(0)\cdot(\Pi_{0}\lambda(0)) vanish; they are displayed for uniformity of notation with the general case.

Assume finally:

(VT′') (Law-transported injection certificates.) For every N≥1N\ge1 and every real number ss with 0<s≤T0<s\le T, the observation filtration satisfies:

(C0) (The conditioning σ\sigma-algebra is generated by the record prefix.) Gs\mathcal{G}_{s} is W(s)W^{(s)}-generated up to null sets in (Ωag,Fag,Pag)(\Omega^{\mathrm{ag}},\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{ag}},P^{\mathrm{ag}}), in the sense of Factorisation of Random Variables Through a Measurable Map, the Variational Form of the Mean-Square Filtering Error, and Its Invariance Under the Joint Law applied with the measurable space (Rs,Rs)(\mathbf{R}_{s},\mathcal{R}_{s}) and the map W(s)W^{(s)}.

Moreover, for every real number ss with 0<s≤T0<s\le T, every c∈Rlc\in\mathbb{R}^{l}, every profile λ\lambda and every real number ϵ>0\epsilon>0 there is a natural number N2N_{2} such that for every natural number N≥N2N\ge N_{2} there exist: a probability space (Ω′,F′,P′)(\Omega',\mathcal{F}',P'); a set Y∈Rs\mathsf{Y}\in\mathcal{R}_{s} with its trace σ\sigma-algebra Y={E∈Rs:E⊆Y}\mathcal{Y}=\{E\in\mathcal{R}_{s}:E\subseteq\mathsf{Y}\} (a σ\sigma-algebra on Y\mathsf{Y} by claim 1 of Assembly of Measure Spaces: Restriction, Transport, One-Point Spaces, and Countable Disjoint Unions) and a σ\sigma-finite measure ϱ0\varrho_{0} on (Y,Y)(\mathsf{Y},\mathcal{Y}); a natural number d≥1d\ge1; square-integrable random variables ϑ1,…,ϑd\vartheta_{1},\dots,\vartheta_{d} on (Ω′,F′,P′)(\Omega',\mathcal{F}',P'), collected in ϑ=(ϑ1,…,ϑd)\vartheta=(\vartheta_{1},\dots,\vartheta_{d}); a map D′:Ω′→Y\mathsf{D}':\Omega'\to\mathsf{Y} measurable with respect to F′\mathcal{F}' and Y\mathcal{Y}; a square-integrable random variable X†X^{\dagger} on (Ω′,F′,P′)(\Omega',\mathcal{F}',P'); a function p:Rd×Y→[0,∞)p:\mathbb{R}^{d}\times\mathsf{Y}\to[0,\infty); a map G:Y→RG:\mathsf{Y}\to\mathbb{R}; and vectors α\alpha, zz, a1,…,ada_{1},\dots,a_{d} in Euclidean space Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}, such that:

(a) (Law identity.) The pair (X†,D′)(X^{\dagger},\mathsf{D}'), with D′\mathsf{D}' regarded as Rs\mathbf{R}_{s}-valued, is measurable with respect to F′\mathcal{F}' and B(R)⊗Rs\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})\otimes\mathcal{R}_{s}, the pair (c⋅Xs′,W(s))(c\cdot X'_{s},W^{(s)}) is measurable with respect to Fag\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{ag}} and B(R)⊗Rs\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})\otimes\mathcal{R}_{s}, c⋅Xs′c\cdot X'_{s} is square-integrable on (Ωag,Fag,Pag)(\Omega^{\mathrm{ag}},\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{ag}},P^{\mathrm{ag}}), and the image measure of P′P' under (X†,D′)(X^{\dagger},\mathsf{D}') equals the image measure of PagP^{\mathrm{ag}} under (c⋅Xs′,W(s))(c\cdot X'_{s},W^{(s)}) on B(R)⊗Rs\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})\otimes\mathcal{R}_{s}.

(C1) (Factorisation through the record.) σ(D′)={D′−1(E):E∈Y}\sigma(\mathsf{D}')=\{\mathsf{D}'^{-1}(E):E\in\mathcal{Y}\}, and every random variable on (Ω′,F′,P′)(\Omega',\mathcal{F}',P') that is measurable with respect to σ(D′)\sigma(\mathsf{D}') and square-integrable equals g∘D′g\circ\mathsf{D}' for some g:Y→Rg:\mathsf{Y}\to\mathbb{R} measurable with respect to Y\mathcal{Y} and B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}), for which g∘D′g\circ\mathsf{D}' is then square-integrable.

(C2′') (Van Trees regularity and mixture-weight information.) The probability space (Ω′,F′,P′)(\Omega',\mathcal{F}',P'), the natural number dd (in the role of ll), the measurable space (Y,Y)(\mathsf{Y},\mathcal{Y}) carrying ϱ0\varrho_{0}, the random variables ϑ1,…,ϑd\vartheta_{1},\dots,\vartheta_{d}, the map D′\mathsf{D}' and the density pp satisfy hypotheses (i), (ii) and (iii) of The Multivariate van Trees Inequality and hypothesis (iv′') of Score Identities and the Mixture-Weight Directional van Trees Inequality; write Iz∈[0,∞)\mathcal{I}_{z}\in[0,\infty) for the mixture-weight information of that lemma in the direction zz for the shifts a1,…,ada_{1},\dots,a_{d} (with n=dn=d).

(C3) (Approximation of the estimand.) GG is measurable with respect to Y\mathcal{Y} and B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}), G(D′)=G∘D′G(\mathsf{D}')=G\circ\mathsf{D}' is square-integrable, and, with α⋅ϑ=∑j=1dαjϑj\alpha\cdot\vartheta=\sum_{j=1}^{d}\alpha_{j}\vartheta_{j},

∥α⋅ϑ+G(D′)−X†∥2≤ϵ.\bigl\lVert\alpha\cdot\vartheta+G(\mathsf{D}')-X^{\dagger}\bigr\rVert_{2}\le\epsilon .

(C4′') (Pairing, information and shift bounds.)

α⋅z ≥ c⋅ψλ(s)−ϵ,Iz ≤ As(λ)+ϵ,max⁡1≤j≤d∣α⋅aj∣ ≤ ϵ,\alpha\cdot z\ \ge\ c\cdot\psi_{\lambda}(s)-\epsilon,\qquad \mathcal{I}_{z}\ \le\ \mathcal{A}_{s}(\lambda)+\epsilon,\qquad \max_{1\le j\le d}|\alpha\cdot a_{j}|\ \le\ \epsilon ,

with ∣⋅∣|\cdot| the absolute value.

Hypothesis (VT′') makes no reference to π\pi or to the blocks: it certifies, on a copy (Ω′,F′,P′)(\Omega',\mathcal{F}',P') carrying the joint law of (c⋅Xs′,W(s))(c\cdot X'_{s},W^{(s)}), the estimand c⋅Xs′c\cdot X'_{s} on the whole sample space, and the localization to the near-field tracked events is carried out in the proof of claim 3 by means of the fourth-moment bound of claim 2. The time s=0s=0 is excluded from (VT′'); at s=0s=0 claim 2 rests on (I0) alone.

(MS) (Measurability of the tracked energy density.) For every natural number N≥1N\ge1, every admissible parameter vector π\pi and every k∈{0,…,K−1}k\in\{0,\dots,K-1\}, the function

s ⟼ E[1Tknr(s) us⋅Rsus]s\ \longmapsto\ \mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{T}^{\mathrm{nr}}_{k}(s)}\,u_{s}\cdot R_{s}u_{s}\bigr]

is measurable on [tk,tk+1][t_{k},t_{k+1}] for the trace Borel σ\sigma-algebra of that interval, and so are the functions s↦E[1−1Tk(s)]s\mapsto\mathbb{E}[1-\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{T}_{k}(s)}] and s↦E[1Tkfr(s)]s\mapsto\mathbb{E}[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{T}^{\mathrm{fr}}_{k}(s)}]. The integrals of these three functions over [tk,tk+1][t_{k},t_{k+1}] are the kk-th summands of claim 7 and of claims 1(d) and 1(c) of the ledger lemma, so (MS) records what the writing of those claims already presupposes.

Then the following hold.

1. (The Kalman covariance is well defined.) Π0\Pi_{0} is symmetric positive semidefinite; every entry of E\mathcal{E}, of Θ⋆\Theta^{\star} and of D~\tilde{D} is continuous on [0,T][0,T]; and every Θt⋆\Theta^{\star}_{t} and every D~t\tilde{D}_{t} is positive semidefinite. Consequently Π\Pi exists, is unique, has continuous entries, and every Πt\Pi_{t} is symmetric positive semidefinite. Moreover every Ξt\Xi_{t} is symmetric positive semidefinite with entries continuous on [0,T][0,T], and the function

s ⟼ ∑γ=1l∑δ=1lΞsγδ Πsγδs\ \longmapsto\ \sum_{\gamma=1}^{l}\sum_{\delta=1}^{l}\Xi^{\gamma\delta}_{s}\,\Pi^{\gamma\delta}_{s}

is continuous, nonnegative and Lebesgue integrable on [0,T][0,T].

2. (Pointwise filtering bound.) Let s∈[0,T]s\in[0,T]. Then for every N≥1N\ge1 the components of Xs′−ssX'_{s}-\mathfrak{s}_{s} are Gs\mathcal{G}_{s}-measurable, so that εsγ\varepsilon^{\gamma}_{s} is almost surely equal to Xs′γ−E[Xs′γ∣Gs]X'^{\gamma}_{s}-\mathbb{E}[X'^{\gamma}_{s}\mid\mathcal{G}_{s}] for every choice of the conditional expectations, and

E[∣Xs′∣4] ≤ cQ κ♯,\mathbb{E}\bigl[|X'_{s}|^{4}\bigr]\ \le\ c_{Q}\,\kappa^{\sharp},

with ∣Xs′∣2=∑γ(Xs′γ)2|X'_{s}|^{2}=\sum_{\gamma}(X'^{\gamma}_{s})^{2}. Moreover, for every c∈Rlc\in\mathbb{R}^{l} and every real η>0\eta>0 there is a natural number N3N_{3} such that for every N≥N3N\ge N_{3}

E[∑γ=1l∑δ=1lcγcδ εsγεsδ] ≥ c⋅(Πsc)−η.\mathbb{E}\Bigl[\sum_{\gamma=1}^{l}\sum_{\delta=1}^{l}c^{\gamma}c^{\delta}\,\varepsilon^{\gamma}_{s}\varepsilon^{\delta}_{s}\Bigr]\ \ge\ c\cdot\bigl(\Pi_{s}c\bigr)-\eta .

3. (The filtering term.) Let π\pi be an admissible parameter vector satisfying the absorption condition of part (a) of the asymptotic lower bound theorem, and let η>0\eta>0 be real. Then there is a natural number N4N_{4} such that for every N≥N4N\ge N_{4}

∑k=0K−1∫[tk,tk+1]E[1Tknr(s) us⋅Rsus] ds ≥ ∫[0,T]∑γ=1l∑δ=1lΞsγδ Πsγδ ds − η,\sum_{k=0}^{K-1}\int_{[t_{k},t_{k+1}]}\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{T}^{\mathrm{nr}}_{k}(s)}\,u_{s}\cdot R_{s}u_{s}\bigr]\,ds\ \ge\ \int_{[0,T]}\sum_{\gamma=1}^{l}\sum_{\delta=1}^{l}\Xi^{\gamma\delta}_{s}\,\Pi^{\gamma\delta}_{s}\,ds\ -\ \eta ,

the entry pairing x⋅My=∑p,qMpqxpyqx\cdot My=\sum_{p,q}M^{pq}x^{p}y^{q} of the completion-of-squares theorem being used on the left.

4. (Asymptotic lower bound by the fluctuation LQG value.) For every real ε′′>0\varepsilon''>0 there is a natural number N5N_{5} such that

JN ≥ V0+∫[0,T]∑γ=1l∑δ=1lΞsγδ Πsγδ ds − ε′′for every N≥N5;\mathcal{J}_{N}\ \ge\ V_{0}+\int_{[0,T]}\sum_{\gamma=1}^{l}\sum_{\delta=1}^{l}\Xi^{\gamma\delta}_{s}\,\Pi^{\gamma\delta}_{s}\,ds\ -\ \varepsilon''\qquad\text{for every }N\ge N_{5};

that is, lim inf⁡N→∞JN ≥ V0+∫[0,T]∑γ,δΞsγδΠsγδ ds\liminf_{N\to\infty}\mathcal{J}_{N}\ \ge\ V_{0}+\int_{[0,T]}\sum_{\gamma,\delta}\Xi^{\gamma\delta}_{s}\Pi^{\gamma\delta}_{s}\,ds.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…