TheoremBase

Well-Posedness of the Lifted Hamilton-Jacobi Equation with a Wick-Square Cost Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure, by Gaussian Dressing

For the lifted Hamilton-Jacobi equation with a Wick-square cost relative to a diagonal Gaussian measure, viscosity solutions relative to the quadratic Riccati profile satisfy comparison, exist and are unique among functions differing from the profile by a bounded function; the difference is the bounded solution of the lifted Ornstein-Uhlenbeck equation relative to the dressed Gaussian, and for a constant cost the solution is explicit.

Statement

In the settings of The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background and The Intrinsic Calculus on the Wasserstein Space: Standing Notation, let cc be a variance vector, let a∈Ra\in\mathbb{R} be positive, and let (D,DΣ,E,Σ)(\mathcal{D},\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma},\mathcal{E},\Sigma) be the Gaussian free-energy pair with variances cc and temperature aa. Let λ0,θ∈R\lambda_{0},\theta\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 0<λ00<\lambda_{0} and 0<θ≤10<\theta\le1, let β∈Rd\beta\in\mathbb{R}^{d} satisfy (a/ci)2+λ0a/ci+2θβi>0(a/c_{i})^{2}+\lambda_{0}a/c_{i}+2\theta\beta_{i}>0 for every i∈[d]i\in[d], and let g:P2(Rd)→Rg:\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d})\to\mathbb{R} be bounded and uniformly continuous from (P2(Rd),W2)(\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),W_{2}) to R\mathbb{R} with the metric of The Absolute Value Metric on the Real Line; fix C∈RC\in\mathbb{R} with ∣g(μ)∣≤C|g(\mu)|\le C for every μ∈P2(Rd)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}), where ∣s∣|s| is the absolute value. Let c′c' be the dressed variances, Φ0\Phi_{0} the quadratic profile and e=∑i=1d(a bi−βici)e=\sum_{i=1}^{d}(a\,b_{i}-\beta_{i}c_{i}) the real number of Gaussian Dressing of the Wick-Square Cost: the Riccati Coefficients, the Dressed Variances, the Quadratic Profile, the Shifted Pair and the Shifted Operator §operator, with b1,…,bdb_{1},\dots,b_{d} the Riccati coefficients of Gaussian Dressing of the Wick-Square Cost: the Riccati Coefficients, the Dressed Variances, the Quadratic Profile, the Shifted Pair and the Shifted Operator §riccati, all for these cc, aa, λ0\lambda_{0}, θ\theta and β\beta. The function Φ0\Phi_{0} is an intrinsic test function on D\mathcal{D} by Gaussian Dressing of the Wick-Square Cost: the Riccati Coefficients, the Dressed Variances, the Quadratic Profile, the Shifted Pair and the Shifted Operator §profile and Restrictions, Sums, Real Multiples and Differences of Intrinsic Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space §restriction, and the penalty domain of the Gaussian free-energy pair with variances c′c' and temperature aa is D\mathcal{D} by Gaussian Dressing of the Wick-Square Cost: the Riccati Coefficients, the Dressed Variances, the Quadratic Profile, the Shifted Pair and the Shifted Operator §pairs. Viscosity subsolutions, supersolutions and solutions relative to the profile Φ0\Phi_{0} are those of the lifted Wick-square Hamilton-Jacobi equation with discount λ0\lambda_{0}, control cost θ\theta, couplings β\beta and running cost gg; for u:D→Ru:\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} the function u−Φ0u-\Phi_{0} on D\mathcal{D} takes the value u(μ)−Φ0(μ)u(\mu)-\Phi_{0}(\mu) at μ\mu, and λ0−1\lambda_{0}^{-1} is the multiplicative inverse of λ0\lambda_{0}.

1. (Comparison) Let u:D→Ru:\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} be a viscosity subsolution and v:D→Rv:\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} a viscosity supersolution relative to the profile Φ0\Phi_{0}, and let k,k′∈Rk,k'\in\mathbb{R} satisfy u(μ)−Φ0(μ)≤ku(\mu)-\Phi_{0}(\mu)\le k and k′≤v(μ)−Φ0(μ)k'\le v(\mu)-\Phi_{0}(\mu) for every μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}. Then u(μ)≤v(μ)u(\mu)\le v(\mu) for every μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}.

2. (Existence) There is a viscosity solution U:D→RU:\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} relative to the profile Φ0\Phi_{0} with

−λ0−1(C+∣e∣)≤U(μ)−Φ0(μ)≤λ0−1(C+∣e∣)for every μ∈D.-\lambda_{0}^{-1}\bigl(C+|e|\bigr)\le U(\mu)-\Phi_{0}(\mu)\le\lambda_{0}^{-1}\bigl(C+|e|\bigr)\qquad\text{for every }\mu\in\mathcal{D}.

3. (Uniqueness) Let U,U′:D→RU,U':\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} be viscosity solutions relative to the profile Φ0\Phi_{0} such that U−Φ0U-\Phi_{0} and U′−Φ0U'-\Phi_{0} are bounded. Then U(μ)=U′(μ)U(\mu)=U'(\mu) for every μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}.

4. (Representation) Let U:D→RU:\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} be such that U−Φ0U-\Phi_{0} is bounded. Then UU is a viscosity solution relative to the profile Φ0\Phi_{0} if and only if U−Φ0U-\Phi_{0} is a viscosity solution of the lifted Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Hamilton-Jacobi equation with variances c′c', temperature aa, discount λ0\lambda_{0}, control cost θ\theta and running cost ν↦g(ν)+e\nu\mapsto g(\nu)+e.

5. (Constant cost) Suppose that gg is constant, with value g0g_{0}. Then the function U0:D→RU_{0}:\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R}, U0(μ)=Φ0(μ)+λ0−1(g0+e)U_{0}(\mu)=\Phi_{0}(\mu)+\lambda_{0}^{-1}(g_{0}+e), is a viscosity solution relative to the profile Φ0\Phi_{0}, and every viscosity solution UU relative to the profile Φ0\Phi_{0} with U−Φ0U-\Phi_{0} bounded equals U0U_{0}.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…