Adopt the setting and notation of The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record (as also adopted by The Copy Clocks Have Independent Poisson Increments on the Clock Interval: Law Identity with the Uniform Poisson Path and Applicability of the Window Discrepancy Bound ): the probability space ( Ω , F , P ) (\Omega,\mathcal{F},P) ( Ω , F , P ) with expectation E \mathbb{E} E , the natural numbers N ≥ 1 N\ge1 N ≥ 1 , l ≥ 2 l\ge2 l ≥ 2 , m ≥ 1 m\ge1 m ≥ 1 , l ~ ≥ 1 \tilde{l}\ge1 l ~ ≥ 1 , the real numbers B ≥ 0 B\ge0 B ≥ 0 , T > 0 T>0 T > 0 and R > 0 R>0 R > 0 with R ≥ N B T R\ge NBT R ≥ NBT , the transition labels c c c , the cells I c , j = ( b j − 1 c , b j c ] I_{c,j}=(b^{c}_{j-1},b^{c}_j] I c , j = ( b j − 1 c , b j c ] (1 ≤ j ≤ J c 1\le j\le J_c 1 ≤ j ≤ J c ) of lengths ∣ I c , j ∣ |I_{c,j}| ∣ I c , j ∣ , indexed by the finite set L \mathsf{L} L of pairs q = ( c , j ) q=(c,j) q = ( c , j ) with d d d elements and identified with { 1 , … , d } \{1,\dots,d\} { 1 , … , d } by the fixed bijection, so that points of Euclidean space R d \mathbb{R}^d R d have coordinates indexed by L \mathsf{L} L ; the cell-count vector K = ( K q ) q ∈ L \mathsf{K}=(\mathsf{K}_q)_{q\in\mathsf{L}} K = ( K q ) q ∈ L ; and the copy clocks P ♯ = ( P ♯ , c ) c \mathsf{P}^{\sharp}=(\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c})_c P ♯ = ( P ♯ , c ) c , all of whose paths u ↦ P u ♯ , c ( ω ) u\mapsto\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_u(\omega) u ↦ P u ♯ , c ( ω ) are counting paths . Recall N 0 = N ∪ { 0 } \mathbb{N}_0=\mathbb{N}\cup\{0\} N 0 = N ∪ { 0 } from the adopted setting, and write μ q = ∣ I c , j ∣ > 0 \mu_q=|I_{c,j}|>0 μ q = ∣ I c , j ∣ > 0 for q = ( c , j ) q=(c,j) q = ( c , j ) , μ = ( μ q ) q ∈ L ∈ R d \mu=(\mu_q)_{q\in\mathsf{L}}\in\mathbb{R}^d μ = ( μ q ) q ∈ L ∈ R d (the vector of cell lengths ; unrelated to the copy measure μ ♯ \mu^{\sharp} μ ♯ , which is not used here) and μ max = max q ∈ L μ q \mu_{\max}=\max_{q\in\mathsf{L}}\mu_q μ m a x = max q ∈ L μ q . Adopt from Cell-Count Form of a Compensated Counting-Path Functional Along a Time Change: Window-Discrepancy Bounds for the Time-Change and Partial-Cell Errors , for a counting path p p p and a real number w ≥ 0 w\ge0 w ≥ 0 , the window discrepancy
D i s c w ( p ) = sup { ∣ p ( u ′ ) − p ( u ) − ( u ′ − u ) ∣ : 0 ≤ u ≤ u ′ ≤ R , u ′ − u ≤ w } , \mathrm{Disc}_w(p)=\sup\bigl\{|p(u')-p(u)-(u'-u)|:\ 0\le u\le u'\le R,\ u'-u\le w\bigr\}, Disc w ( p ) = sup { ∣ p ( u ′ ) − p ( u ) − ( u ′ − u ) ∣ : 0 ≤ u ≤ u ′ ≤ R , u ′ − u ≤ w } ,
the least upper bound of a nonempty set bounded above by p ( R ) + R p(R)+R p ( R ) + R , formed with the present R R R ; and from Series Formula, Exponential Moments, and Chernoff Tail Bounds for the Poisson Distribution the Chernoff exponent ϖ k ( x ) = min ( x 2 4 k , x 2 ) \varpi_{k}(x)=\min\bigl(\tfrac{x^{2}}{4k},\tfrac{x}{2}\bigr) ϖ k ( x ) = min ( 4 k x 2 , 2 x ) (k > 0 k>0 k > 0 , x > 0 x>0 x > 0 ), as used in Uniform Window Discrepancy Bound for a Counting Process with Poisson Increments on the Integer Grid (the letter ϖ \varpi ϖ denotes here this exponent only, never the profile of the copy setting). Write exp \exp exp for the exponential function , x ⋅ y x\cdot y x ⋅ y for the dot product , t 1 / 2 = t t^{1/2}=\sqrt{t} t 1/2 = t for the nonnegative square root of a real t ≥ 0 t\ge0 t ≥ 0 , t 1 / 4 = ( t 1 / 2 ) 1 / 2 t^{1/4}=(t^{1/2})^{1/2} t 1/4 = ( t 1/2 ) 1/2 , 1 A \mathbf{1}_A 1 A for the indicator of an event A A A (claim 1 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions ), ⌈ w ⌉ \lceil w\rceil ⌈ w ⌉ for the least natural number that is ≥ w \ge w ≥ w for a real w ≥ 0 w\ge0 w ≥ 0 (it exists by The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers and The Natural Numbers Are Well Ordered , and satisfies ⌈ w ⌉ ≥ 1 \lceil w\rceil\ge1 ⌈ w ⌉ ≥ 1 since 1 1 1 is the least natural number), and F \mathcal{F} F -measurable for a real-valued map on Ω \Omega Ω that is measurable with respect to F \mathcal{F} F and the Borel σ \sigma σ -algebra of the real line. Integrable , square-integrable and the mean-square norm ∥ X ∥ 2 = ( E [ X 2 ] ) 1 / 2 \lVert X\rVert_2=(\mathbb{E}[X^{2}])^{1/2} ∥ X ∥ 2 = ( E [ X 2 ] ) 1/2 on ( Ω , F , P ) (\Omega,\mathcal{F},P) ( Ω , F , P ) are as in those definitions. The function w ↦ ⌈ w ⌉ w\mapsto\lceil w\rceil w ↦ ⌈ w ⌉ agrees with the usual ceiling except at w = 0 w=0 w = 0 , where it equals 1 1 1 . Put
M 4 ( R ) = ( 8 ( 4096 + 17 R 4 ) ) 1 / 4 . \mathsf{M}_4(R)=\bigl(8\,(4096+17R^{4})\bigr)^{1/4}. M 4 ( R ) = ( 8 ( 4096 + 17 R 4 ) ) 1/4 .
1. (Square-integrable majorant of one window discrepancy.) Assume that R R R is a natural number. Let c c c be a transition label, let w ≥ 0 w\ge0 w ≥ 0 and x > 0 x>0 x > 0 be real numbers, and put n = ⌈ w ⌉ \mathsf{n}=\lceil w\rceil n = ⌈ w ⌉ . Then there is an event G w , x c ∈ F G^{c}_{w,x}\in\mathcal{F} G w , x c ∈ F with
P ( Ω ∖ G w , x c ) ≤ 2 ( R + 1 ) ( n + 3 ) exp ( − ϖ n + 2 ( x ) ) P\bigl(\Omega\setminus G^{c}_{w,x}\bigr)\le2\,(R+1)(\mathsf{n}+3)\exp\bigl(-\varpi_{\mathsf{n}+2}(x)\bigr) P ( Ω ∖ G w , x c ) ≤ 2 ( R + 1 ) ( n + 3 ) exp ( − ϖ n + 2 ( x ) )
such that the map
Ξ w , x c = ( x + 2 ) 1 G w , x c + ( P R ♯ , c + R ) 1 Ω ∖ G w , x c : Ω → [ 0 , ∞ ) \Xi^{c}_{w,x}=(x+2)\,\mathbf{1}_{G^{c}_{w,x}}+\bigl(\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R+R\bigr)\mathbf{1}_{\Omega\setminus G^{c}_{w,x}}:\Omega\to[0,\infty) Ξ w , x c = ( x + 2 ) 1 G w , x c + ( P R ♯ , c + R ) 1 Ω ∖ G w , x c : Ω → [ 0 , ∞ )
is F \mathcal{F} F -measurable and square-integrable, satisfies D i s c w ( P ♯ , c ( ω ) ) ≤ Ξ w , x c ( ω ) \mathrm{Disc}_{w}\bigl(\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}(\omega)\bigr)\le\Xi^{c}_{w,x}(\omega) Disc w ( P ♯ , c ( ω ) ) ≤ Ξ w , x c ( ω ) for every ω ∈ Ω \omega\in\Omega ω ∈ Ω (where P ♯ , c ( ω ) \mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}(\omega) P ♯ , c ( ω ) is the counting path u ↦ P u ♯ , c ( ω ) u\mapsto\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_u(\omega) u ↦ P u ♯ , c ( ω ) ), and
∥ Ξ w , x c ∥ 2 ≤ x + 2 + M 4 ( R ) ( 2 ( R + 1 ) ( n + 3 ) exp ( − ϖ n + 2 ( x ) ) ) 1 / 4 . \bigl\lVert\Xi^{c}_{w,x}\bigr\rVert_2\le x+2+\mathsf{M}_4(R)\,\Bigl(2\,(R+1)(\mathsf{n}+3)\exp\bigl(-\varpi_{\mathsf{n}+2}(x)\bigr)\Bigr)^{1/4}. Ξ w , x c 2 ≤ x + 2 + M 4 ( R ) ( 2 ( R + 1 ) ( n + 3 ) exp ( − ϖ n + 2 ( x ) ) ) 1/4 .
Moreover P R ♯ , c \mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R P R ♯ , c has the Poisson distribution with parameter R R R , and E [ ( P R ♯ , c + R ) 4 ] ≤ M 4 ( R ) 4 \mathbb{E}\bigl[(\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R+R)^{4}\bigr]\le\mathsf{M}_4(R)^{4} E [ ( P R ♯ , c + R ) 4 ] ≤ M 4 ( R ) 4 .
2. (Majorant of a sum of two window discrepancies.) Assume that R R R is a natural number, let w 1 ≥ 0 w_1\ge0 w 1 ≥ 0 , w 2 ≥ 0 w_2\ge0 w 2 ≥ 0 , x 1 > 0 x_1>0 x 1 > 0 and x 2 > 0 x_2>0 x 2 > 0 be real numbers, and for every transition label c c c and i ∈ { 1 , 2 } i\in\{1,2\} i ∈ { 1 , 2 } let G w i , x i c G^{c}_{w_i,x_i} G w i , x i c be an event as furnished by claim 1 (for the data c c c , w i w_i w i , x i x_i x i ) and Ξ w i , x i c \Xi^{c}_{w_i,x_i} Ξ w i , x i c the corresponding map; put Ξ c = Ξ w 1 , x 1 c + Ξ w 2 , x 2 c \Xi^{c}=\Xi^{c}_{w_1,x_1}+\Xi^{c}_{w_2,x_2} Ξ c = Ξ w 1 , x 1 c + Ξ w 2 , x 2 c . Then, for every such choice, each Ξ c : Ω → [ 0 , ∞ ) \Xi^{c}:\Omega\to[0,\infty) Ξ c : Ω → [ 0 , ∞ ) is F \mathcal{F} F -measurable and square-integrable, D i s c w 1 ( P ♯ , c ( ω ) ) + D i s c w 2 ( P ♯ , c ( ω ) ) ≤ Ξ c ( ω ) \mathrm{Disc}_{w_1}(\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}(\omega))+\mathrm{Disc}_{w_2}(\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}(\omega))\le\Xi^{c}(\omega) Disc w 1 ( P ♯ , c ( ω )) + Disc w 2 ( P ♯ , c ( ω )) ≤ Ξ c ( ω ) for every ω ∈ Ω \omega\in\Omega ω ∈ Ω , and
∥ Ξ c ∥ 2 ≤ x 1 + x 2 + 4 + M 4 ( R ) ∑ i = 1 2 ( 2 ( R + 1 ) ( ⌈ w i ⌉ + 3 ) exp ( − ϖ ⌈ w i ⌉ + 2 ( x i ) ) ) 1 / 4 . \lVert\Xi^{c}\rVert_2\le x_1+x_2+4+\mathsf{M}_4(R)\sum_{i=1}^{2}\Bigl(2\,(R+1)(\lceil w_i\rceil+3)\exp\bigl(-\varpi_{\lceil w_i\rceil+2}(x_i)\bigr)\Bigr)^{1/4}. ∥ Ξ c ∥ 2 ≤ x 1 + x 2 + 4 + M 4 ( R ) i = 1 ∑ 2 ( 2 ( R + 1 ) (⌈ w i ⌉ + 3 ) exp ( − ϖ ⌈ w i ⌉ + 2 ( x i ) ) ) 1/4 .
Consequently, in any instance of the setting and of the hypotheses other than (DM) of Mean-Square Assembly of the Estimand Linearisation on the Synthetic Copy: Approximation of the Recentred Copy Endpoint by an Affine Function of the Parameter whose probability space, copy clocks, clock horizon R R R (a natural number), cells and bijection of L \mathsf{L} L with { 1 , … , d } \{1,\dots,d\} { 1 , … , d } are the present ones, hypothesis (DM) of that lemma holds for the family ( Ξ c ) c (\Xi^{c})_{c} ( Ξ c ) c formed with w 1 = w c l k w_1=\mathsf{w}^{\mathrm{clk}} w 1 = w clk (the clock tolerance of that lemma, a real number ≥ 0 \ge0 ≥ 0 ) and w 2 = μ max w_2=\mu_{\max} w 2 = μ m a x , whatever the event G G G of that instance.
3. (Second and fourth moments of a weighted centred cell-count sum.) The cell counts K q \mathsf{K}_q K q (q ∈ L q\in\mathsf{L} q ∈ L ) are independent , and K q \mathsf{K}_q K q has the Poisson distribution with parameter μ q \mu_q μ q . For every α = ( α q ) q ∈ L ∈ R d \alpha=(\alpha_q)_{q\in\mathsf{L}}\in\mathbb{R}^d α = ( α q ) q ∈ L ∈ R d the random variable α ⋅ ( K − μ ) = ∑ q ∈ L α q ( K q − μ q ) \alpha\cdot(\mathsf{K}-\mu)=\sum_{q\in\mathsf{L}}\alpha_q(\mathsf{K}_q-\mu_q) α ⋅ ( K − μ ) = ∑ q ∈ L α q ( K q − μ q ) has an integrable fourth power, and
E [ α ⋅ ( K − μ ) ] = 0 , E [ ( α ⋅ ( K − μ ) ) 2 ] = ∑ q ∈ L α q 2 μ q , E [ ( α ⋅ ( K − μ ) ) 4 ] ≤ 3 ( ∑ q ∈ L α q 2 μ q ) 2 + ∑ q ∈ L α q 4 μ q . \mathbb{E}\bigl[\alpha\cdot(\mathsf{K}-\mu)\bigr]=0,\qquad \mathbb{E}\bigl[(\alpha\cdot(\mathsf{K}-\mu))^{2}\bigr]=\sum_{q\in\mathsf{L}}\alpha_q^{2}\mu_q,\qquad \mathbb{E}\bigl[(\alpha\cdot(\mathsf{K}-\mu))^{4}\bigr]\le3\Bigl(\sum_{q\in\mathsf{L}}\alpha_q^{2}\mu_q\Bigr)^{2}+\sum_{q\in\mathsf{L}}\alpha_q^{4}\mu_q . E [ α ⋅ ( K − μ ) ] = 0 , E [ ( α ⋅ ( K − μ ) ) 2 ] = q ∈ L ∑ α q 2 μ q , E [ ( α ⋅ ( K − μ ) ) 4 ] ≤ 3 ( q ∈ L ∑ α q 2 μ q ) 2 + q ∈ L ∑ α q 4 μ q .
Consequently, in any instance of the setting and of the hypotheses other than (FM) and (DM) of Mean-Square Assembly of the Estimand Linearisation on the Synthetic Copy: Approximation of the Recentred Copy Endpoint by an Affine Function of the Parameter whose probability space, cell-count vector, cells and bijection of L \mathsf{L} L with { 1 , … , d } \{1,\dots,d\} { 1 , … , d } are the present ones, the quantity k 4 \mathsf{k}_4 k 4 of that lemma satisfies k 4 4 ≤ 3 ( ∑ q α q 2 μ q ) 2 + ∑ q α q 4 μ q \mathsf{k}_4^{4}\le3(\sum_q\alpha_q^{2}\mu_q)^{2}+\sum_q\alpha_q^{4}\mu_q k 4 4 ≤ 3 ( ∑ q α q 2 μ q ) 2 + ∑ q α q 4 μ q for its vector α ∈ R d \alpha\in\mathbb{R}^d α ∈ R d of cell coefficients.