Reason: Migrated onto the re-versioned upstream layer; added the hypothesis that the control set A is convex (required by the now-conditional Lipschitz clause of the drift regularity lemma) and renamed the control energy to A_2 to avoid collision with the control set. Bounds unchanged. · 4,139 chars · 21 deps · depth 17
(a) (Well-definedness.) The maps (t,ω)↦1Ω0(ω)∣st(ω)∣2 and (t,ω)↦1Ω0(ω)∣at(ω)∣2 are measurable with respect to the product σ-algebra of the trace Borel σ-algebra on [0,T] and F (by the joint measurability of the state and control), and so is (t,ω)↦1Ω0(ω)(gtγ(ω))2 for each γ. Consequently, by the Tonelli theorem, the functions t↦E[∣st∣2], t↦E[∣at∣2], and t↦E[(gtγ)2] (expectations, which are unchanged by the 1Ω0 modification because Ω0 has probability 1) are measurable on [0,T] as [0,∞]-valued functions, with E[∣st∣2]≤4N and E[(gtγ)2]≤16N(l−1)2B2 finite for every t, and the Lebesgue integral
A2=∫[0,T]E[∣at∣2]dt
is well defined with value in [0,∞] (the subscripted A2 is distinct from the control set A).
Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.