TheoremBase

The Simple, Nonnegative, Integrable and Signed Integrals Are Predicative in the Measure and the Function, at Any Variable Positions

The relation between a measure (or a map from the σ-algebra to [0,∞], or a finite signed measure from a given class), a function and the value of its integral is expressed by a predicative formula, for the simple integral, the integral of a nonnegative measurable function, the integral of an integrable function and the integral against a finite signed measure, at any variable positions.

Statement

In the setting of Routine Facts, Continued: Typed Arithmetic, Maps and Predicativity and Measurable Functions and the Lebesgue Integral: Notation, let (X,F)(X,\mathcal{F}) be a measurable space; this item is a statement of the metatheory. Let N≥1N\ge1 be a metatheoretic number, let x0,…,xN−1x_{0},\dots,x_{N-1} be distinct set variables, and let i,j,k<Ni,j,k<N, not necessarily distinct. Each clause states that a condition on x0,…,xN−1x_{0},\dots,x_{N-1} is predicative: expressed by a predicative formula, with x0,…,xN−1x_{0},\dots,x_{N-1} in place of the variables of Conditions Expressed by a Predicative Formula, and Guards (i) and no displayed variables. The other letters, among them XX, F\mathcal{F}, the sets of numbers with their operations and orders, and the class MM of (iv), are parameters.

For a map m:F→[0,∞]m:\mathcal{F}\to[0,\infty], not necessarily a measure, Im(s)I_{m}(s), ∫g dm\int g\,dm, L1(m)\mathcal{L}^{1}(m) and ∫f dm\int f\,dm are formed, with mm in place of the measure, by the formulas of Simple Functions, Nonnegative Simple Functions, and the Simple Integral (iv), Nonnegative Measurable Maps and Their Lebesgue Integral (ii), Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral (ii) and Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral (iii).

The simple integral. With m=xim=x_{i}, s=xjs=x_{j} and r=xkr=x_{k}: "mm is a map m:F→[0,∞]m:\mathcal{F}\to[0,\infty], s∈S+s\in\mathcal{S}^{+} and r=Im(s)r=I_{m}(s)".

The integral of a nonnegative function. With m=xim=x_{i}, g=xjg=x_{j} and r=xkr=x_{k}: "mm is a map m:F→[0,∞]m:\mathcal{F}\to[0,\infty], g∈M+g\in\mathcal{M}^{+} and r=∫g dmr=\int g\,dm".

The integral of an integrable function. With m=xim=x_{i}, f=xjf=x_{j} and r=xkr=x_{k}: "mm is a map m:F→[0,∞]m:\mathcal{F}\to[0,\infty], f∈L1(m)f\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(m) and r=∫f dmr=\int f\,dm".

The integral against a finite signed measure. Assume the axiom of dependent choice, and let MM be a class of finite signed measures on (X,F)(X,\mathcal{F}); for ν∈M\nu\in M, L1(ν)\mathcal{L}^{1}(\nu) and ∫f dν\int f\,d\nu are as in Integrable Functions and the Integral with Respect to a Finite Signed Measure (i) and Integrable Functions and the Integral with Respect to a Finite Signed Measure (ii). With ν=xi\nu=x_{i}, f=xjf=x_{j} and r=xkr=x_{k}: "ν∈M\nu\in M, f∈L1(ν)f\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\nu) and r=∫f dνr=\int f\,d\nu".

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…