Adopt the setting, notation and hypotheses of the completion-of-squares theorem for the fluctuation cost : the fluctuation processes s t \mathfrak{s}_{t} s t , a t \mathfrak{a}_{t} a t of a solution with regular event Ω 0 \Omega_{0} Ω 0 , empirical state measure Σ \Sigma Σ , control α \alpha α and system filtration ( F t s y s ) t ∈ [ 0 , T ] (\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_{t})_{t\in[0,T]} ( F t sys ) t ∈ [ 0 , T ] , taken about a mean-field trajectory pair ( S , A ) (S,A) ( S , A ) ; the extension ( U , V , β ˉ ) (U,V,\bar{\beta}) ( U , V , β ˉ ) with derivative bound K K K and extended aggregate state drift b ˉ \bar{b} b ˉ ; the extension ( U c , L ˉ , G ˉ ) (U_{c},\bar{L},\bar{G}) ( U c , L ˉ , G ˉ ) with second-derivative bound K c K_{c} K c ; the stationary co-state P P P with bound C P C_{P} C P ; the fluctuation Hessian coefficients H i j ( t ) H_{ij}(t) H ij ( t ) and F γ δ F_{\gamma\delta} F γ δ ; the aggregate fluctuation covariance Θ \Theta Θ and the aggregate state drift b b b ; the drift difference g s = N ( b ( Σ s , α s ) − b ( S s , A s ) ) g_{s}=\sqrt{N}(b(\Sigma_{s},\alpha_{s})-b(S_{s},A_{s})) g s = N ( b ( Σ s , α s ) − b ( S s , A s )) ; the matrices E t , B t , Q t , V t , R t , F ^ E_{t},\mathsf{B}_{t},Q_{t},V_{t},R_{t},\hat{F} E t , B t , Q t , V t , R t , F ^ and the pairing notation x ⋅ M y x\cdot My x ⋅ M y defined there; hypotheses (H1) with constant r > 0 r>0 r > 0 and (H2) with the Riccati family Z = ( Z t ) t ∈ [ 0 , T ] Z=(Z_{t})_{t\in[0,T]} Z = ( Z t ) t ∈ [ 0 , T ] , W t = Z t B t + 1 2 V t W_{t}=Z_{t}\mathsf{B}_{t}+\tfrac{1}{2}V_{t} W t = Z t B t + 2 1 V t and densities z ˙ ( t ) = − ( E t T Z t + Z t E t − W t R t − 1 W t T + Q t ) \dot{z}(t)=-\bigl(E_{t}^{T}Z_{t}+Z_{t}E_{t}-W_{t}R_{t}^{-1}W_{t}^{T}+Q_{t}\bigr) z ˙ ( t ) = − ( E t T Z t + Z t E t − W t R t − 1 W t T + Q t ) ; the constant C Z C_{Z} C Z with ∣ Z t γ δ ∣ ≤ C Z |Z^{\gamma\delta}_{t}|\le C_{Z} ∣ Z t γ δ ∣ ≤ C Z for all indices and all t t t , and the constant c e c_{e} c e ; and the processes
u t = a t + R t − 1 W t T s t , e s = g s − E s s s − B s a s . u_{t}=\mathfrak{a}_{t}+R_{t}^{-1}W_{t}^{T}\mathfrak{s}_{t},\qquad e_{s}=g_{s}-E_{s}\mathfrak{s}_{s}-\mathsf{B}_{s}\mathfrak{a}_{s}. u t = a t + R t − 1 W t T s t , e s = g s − E s s s − B s a s .
The hypothesis A 2 = ∫ [ 0 , T ] E [ ∣ a t ∣ 2 ] d t < ∞ \mathcal{A}_{2}=\int_{[0,T]}\mathbb{E}[|\mathfrak{a}_{t}|^{2}]\,dt<\infty A 2 = ∫ [ 0 , T ] E [ ∣ a t ∣ 2 ] d t < ∞ of the second-order expansion theorem is part of the setting adopted here and is not re-derived; in the intended application the control set is compact , so that ∣ a t ∣ ≤ 2 N R A |\mathfrak{a}_{t}|\le2\sqrt{N}R_{\mathcal{A}} ∣ a t ∣ ≤ 2 N R A everywhere with R A = sup a ∈ A ∣ a ∣ R_{\mathcal{A}}=\sup_{a\in\mathcal{A}}|a| R A = sup a ∈ A ∣ a ∣ and hence A 2 ≤ 4 R A 2 T N < ∞ \mathcal{A}_{2}\le4R_{\mathcal{A}}^{2}TN<\infty A 2 ≤ 4 R A 2 TN < ∞ . The scalar R A R_{\mathcal{A}} R A is distinct from the matrices R t R_{t} R t above. Adopt also the weighted second-moment evolution lemma and its stopped form the stopped weighted second-moment lemma , whose weight family is the present Z Z Z , and, from the first-order expansion lemma for the recentred N N N -agent cost , the quantity D t \mathcal{D}_{t} D t with its bound C D C_{\mathcal{D}} C D . Write z t = ( s t , a t ) ∈ R l + m \mathfrak{z}_{t}=(\mathfrak{s}_{t},\mathfrak{a}_{t})\in\mathbb{R}^{l+m} z t = ( s t , a t ) ∈ R l + m , 1 D \mathbf{1}_{D} 1 D for the indicator of a set D D D , E \mathbb{E} E for the expectation , and ∫ [ a , b ] ⋅ d s \int_{[a,b]}\cdot\,ds ∫ [ a , b ] ⋅ d s for the Lebesgue integral over a compact interval . Stopping times are those of ( F t s y s ) t ∈ [ 0 , T ] (\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_{t})_{t\in[0,T]} ( F t sys ) t ∈ [ 0 , T ] and 1 { s < θ } \mathbf{1}_{\{s<\theta\}} 1 { s < θ } denotes the pre-stopping-time indicator of a stopping time θ \theta θ .
Block data. Let t ♭ t_{\flat} t ♭ and t ♯ t_{\sharp} t ♯ be real numbers with 0 ≤ t ♭ ≤ t ♯ ≤ T 0\le t_{\flat}\le t_{\sharp}\le T 0 ≤ t ♭ ≤ t ♯ ≤ T , let σ \sigma σ be a stopping time with σ ( ω ) ≥ t ♭ \sigma(\omega)\ge t_{\flat} σ ( ω ) ≥ t ♭ for every ω \omega ω , and let G \mathcal{G} G be an event with G ⊆ Ω 0 \mathcal{G}\subseteq\Omega_{0} G ⊆ Ω 0 and G ∈ F t ♭ s y s \mathcal{G}\in\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_{t_{\flat}} G ∈ F t ♭ sys . Define τ : Ω → [ 0 , T ] \tau:\Omega\to[0,T] τ : Ω → [ 0 , T ] by
τ ( ω ) = σ ( ω ) for ω ∈ G , τ ( ω ) = t ♭ for ω ∉ G . \tau(\omega)=\sigma(\omega)\ \text{ for }\omega\in\mathcal{G},\qquad \tau(\omega)=t_{\flat}\ \text{ for }\omega\notin\mathcal{G}. τ ( ω ) = σ ( ω ) for ω ∈ G , τ ( ω ) = t ♭ for ω ∈ / G .
Then the following hold.
1. (The masked stopping time.) τ \tau τ is a stopping time of ( F t s y s ) t ∈ [ 0 , T ] (\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_{t})_{t\in[0,T]} ( F t sys ) t ∈ [ 0 , T ] with τ ≥ t ♭ \tau\ge t_{\flat} τ ≥ t ♭ everywhere; for every s ∈ [ t ♭ , T ] s\in[t_{\flat},T] s ∈ [ t ♭ , T ] one has 1 { s < τ } = 1 G 1 { s < σ } \mathbf{1}_{\{s<\tau\}}=\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{G}}\,\mathbf{1}_{\{s<\sigma\}} 1 { s < τ } = 1 G 1 { s < σ } ; min ( t ♭ , τ ) = t ♭ \min(t_{\flat},\tau)=t_{\flat} min ( t ♭ , τ ) = t ♭ everywhere; and min ( t , τ ) = t ♭ \min(t,\tau)=t_{\flat} min ( t , τ ) = t ♭ off G \mathcal{G} G for every t ∈ [ t ♭ , T ] t\in[t_{\flat},T] t ∈ [ t ♭ , T ] .
2. (Pointwise completion of squares.) At every point of [ 0 , T ] × Ω [0,T]\times\Omega [ 0 , T ] × Ω ,
s s ⋅ z ˙ ( s ) s s + 2 s s ⋅ Z s g s = u s ⋅ R s u s − 1 2 ∑ i = 1 l + m ∑ j = 1 l + m H i j ( s ) z s i z s j + 2 s s ⋅ Z s e s . \mathfrak{s}_{s}\cdot\dot{z}(s)\,\mathfrak{s}_{s}+2\,\mathfrak{s}_{s}\cdot Z_{s}g_{s}\ =\ u_{s}\cdot R_{s}u_{s}\ -\ \tfrac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^{l+m}\sum_{j=1}^{l+m}H_{ij}(s)\,\mathfrak{z}^{i}_{s}\mathfrak{z}^{j}_{s}\ +\ 2\,\mathfrak{s}_{s}\cdot Z_{s}e_{s}. s s ⋅ z ˙ ( s ) s s + 2 s s ⋅ Z s g s = u s ⋅ R s u s − 2 1 i = 1 ∑ l + m j = 1 ∑ l + m H ij ( s ) z s i z s j + 2 s s ⋅ Z s e s .
3. (Block identity.) With τ \tau τ as above and s ♯ = s min ( t ♯ , σ ) \mathfrak{s}^{\sharp}=\mathfrak{s}_{\min(t_{\sharp},\sigma)} s ♯ = s m i n ( t ♯ , σ ) denoting the sampled function taken componentwise, and Z ♯ = Z min ( t ♯ , σ ) Z^{\sharp}=Z_{\min(t_{\sharp},\sigma)} Z ♯ = Z m i n ( t ♯ , σ ) likewise,
∫ [ t ♭ , t ♯ ] E [ 1 G 1 { s < σ } 1 2 ∑ i , j = 1 l + m H i j ( s ) z s i z s j ] d s = E [ 1 G s t ♭ ⋅ Z t ♭ s t ♭ ] − E [ 1 G s ♯ ⋅ Z ♯ s ♯ ] + ∫ [ t ♭ , t ♯ ] ( E [ 1 G 1 { s < σ } ( u s ⋅ R s u s + 2 s s ⋅ Z s e s ) ] + ∑ γ , δ = 1 l Z s γ δ E [ 1 G 1 { s < σ } Θ γ δ ( Σ s , α s ) ] ) d s , \int_{[t_{\flat},t_{\sharp}]}\mathbb{E}\Bigl[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{G}}\mathbf{1}_{\{s<\sigma\}}\;\tfrac{1}{2}\sum_{i,j=1}^{l+m}H_{ij}(s)\,\mathfrak{z}^{i}_{s}\mathfrak{z}^{j}_{s}\Bigr]ds\ =\ \mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{G}}\,\mathfrak{s}_{t_{\flat}}\cdot Z_{t_{\flat}}\mathfrak{s}_{t_{\flat}}\bigr]-\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{G}}\,\mathfrak{s}^{\sharp}\cdot Z^{\sharp}\mathfrak{s}^{\sharp}\bigr]\ +\ \int_{[t_{\flat},t_{\sharp}]}\Bigl(\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{G}}\mathbf{1}_{\{s<\sigma\}}\bigl(u_{s}\cdot R_{s}u_{s}+2\,\mathfrak{s}_{s}\cdot Z_{s}e_{s}\bigr)\bigr]+\sum_{\gamma,\delta=1}^{l}Z^{\gamma\delta}_{s}\,\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{G}}\mathbf{1}_{\{s<\sigma\}}\,\Theta^{\gamma\delta}(\Sigma_{s},\alpha_{s})\bigr]\Bigr)ds , ∫ [ t ♭ , t ♯ ] E [ 1 G 1 { s < σ } 2 1 i , j = 1 ∑ l + m H ij ( s ) z s i z s j ] d s = E [ 1 G s t ♭ ⋅ Z t ♭ s t ♭ ] − E [ 1 G s ♯ ⋅ Z ♯ s ♯ ] + ∫ [ t ♭ , t ♯ ] ( E [ 1 G 1 { s < σ } ( u s ⋅ R s u s + 2 s s ⋅ Z s e s ) ] + γ , δ = 1 ∑ l Z s γ δ E [ 1 G 1 { s < σ } Θ γ δ ( Σ s , α s ) ] ) d s ,
all expectations and integrals being finite.
4. (Block lower bound.) Assume in addition hypothesis (JC) of the localized joint coercivity lemma , with radius ρ ∗ \rho^{*} ρ ∗ as in its claim 2, and assume the confinement condition : ρ s ( ω ) ≤ ρ ∗ \rho_{s}(\omega)\le\rho^{*} ρ s ( ω ) ≤ ρ ∗ whenever s ∈ [ t ♭ , t ♯ ] s\in[t_{\flat},t_{\sharp}] s ∈ [ t ♭ , t ♯ ] , ω ∈ G \omega\in\mathcal{G} ω ∈ G and s < σ ( ω ) s<\sigma(\omega) s < σ ( ω ) . Then
∫ [ t ♭ , t ♯ ] E [ 1 G 1 { s < σ } N D s ] d s ≥ E [ 1 G s t ♭ ⋅ Z t ♭ s t ♭ ] − E [ 1 G s ♯ ⋅ Z ♯ s ♯ ] + r ∫ [ t ♭ , t ♯ ] E [ 1 G 1 { s < σ } ∣ u s ∣ 2 ] d s + ∫ [ t ♭ , t ♯ ] ∑ γ , δ = 1 l Z s γ δ E [ 1 G 1 { s < σ } Θ γ δ ( Σ s , α s ) ] d s − X l i n − X q u a d , \int_{[t_{\flat},t_{\sharp}]}\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{G}}\mathbf{1}_{\{s<\sigma\}}\,N\mathcal{D}_{s}\bigr]ds\ \ge\ \mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{G}}\,\mathfrak{s}_{t_{\flat}}\cdot Z_{t_{\flat}}\mathfrak{s}_{t_{\flat}}\bigr]-\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{G}}\,\mathfrak{s}^{\sharp}\cdot Z^{\sharp}\mathfrak{s}^{\sharp}\bigr]+r\int_{[t_{\flat},t_{\sharp}]}\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{G}}\mathbf{1}_{\{s<\sigma\}}|u_{s}|^{2}\bigr]ds+\int_{[t_{\flat},t_{\sharp}]}\sum_{\gamma,\delta=1}^{l}Z^{\gamma\delta}_{s}\,\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{G}}\mathbf{1}_{\{s<\sigma\}}\Theta^{\gamma\delta}(\Sigma_{s},\alpha_{s})\bigr]ds\ -\ \mathcal{X}^{\mathrm{lin}}\ -\ \mathcal{X}^{\mathrm{quad}}, ∫ [ t ♭ , t ♯ ] E [ 1 G 1 { s < σ } N D s ] d s ≥ E [ 1 G s t ♭ ⋅ Z t ♭ s t ♭ ] − E [ 1 G s ♯ ⋅ Z ♯ s ♯ ] + r ∫ [ t ♭ , t ♯ ] E [ 1 G 1 { s < σ } ∣ u s ∣ 2 ] d s + ∫ [ t ♭ , t ♯ ] γ , δ = 1 ∑ l Z s γ δ E [ 1 G 1 { s < σ } Θ γ δ ( Σ s , α s ) ] d s − X lin − X quad ,
where the two error terms are
X l i n = 2 l 2 C Z c e N − 1 / 2 ∫ [ t ♭ , t ♯ ] E [ 1 G 1 { s < σ } ∣ s s ∣ ( ∣ s s ∣ 2 + ∣ a s ∣ 2 ) ] d s , \mathcal{X}^{\mathrm{lin}}=2\,l^{2}\,C_{Z}\,c_{e}\,N^{-1/2}\int_{[t_{\flat},t_{\sharp}]}\mathbb{E}\Bigl[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{G}}\mathbf{1}_{\{s<\sigma\}}\,|\mathfrak{s}_{s}|\bigl(|\mathfrak{s}_{s}|^{2}+|\mathfrak{a}_{s}|^{2}\bigr)\Bigr]ds, X lin = 2 l 2 C Z c e N − 1/2 ∫ [ t ♭ , t ♯ ] E [ 1 G 1 { s < σ } ∣ s s ∣ ( ∣ s s ∣ 2 + ∣ a s ∣ 2 ) ] d s ,
and
X q u a d = 1 2 ( l + m ) ∫ [ t ♭ , t ♯ ] E [ 1 G 1 { s < σ } ( ω L ( ρ s ) + C P ω b ( ρ s ) ) ∣ z s ∣ 2 ] d s , \mathcal{X}^{\mathrm{quad}}=\tfrac{1}{2}(l+m)\int_{[t_{\flat},t_{\sharp}]}\mathbb{E}\Bigl[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{G}}\mathbf{1}_{\{s<\sigma\}}\bigl(\omega_{L}(\rho_{s})+C_{P}\,\omega_{b}(\rho_{s})\bigr)\,|\mathfrak{z}_{s}|^{2}\Bigr]ds , X quad = 2 1 ( l + m ) ∫ [ t ♭ , t ♯ ] E [ 1 G 1 { s < σ } ( ω L ( ρ s ) + C P ω b ( ρ s ) ) ∣ z s ∣ 2 ] d s ,
with ρ s \rho_{s} ρ s and the moduli ω L , ω b \omega_{L},\omega_{b} ω L , ω b of the second-order expansion theorem ; and moreover X q u a d ≤ c J 2 ∫ [ t ♭ , t ♯ ] E [ 1 G 1 { s < σ } ∣ z s ∣ 2 ] d s \mathcal{X}^{\mathrm{quad}}\le\tfrac{c_{J}}{2}\int_{[t_{\flat},t_{\sharp}]}\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{G}}\mathbf{1}_{\{s<\sigma\}}|\mathfrak{z}_{s}|^{2}\bigr]ds X quad ≤ 2 c J ∫ [ t ♭ , t ♯ ] E [ 1 G 1 { s < σ } ∣ z s ∣ 2 ] d s .