TheoremBase

A Viscous Hamilton-Jacobi Operator with a Monotone Nonlinearity Satisfies the Second-Order Comparison Hypotheses

A viscous Hamilton-Jacobi operator on a Hilbert triple whose Hamiltonian is half a nonnegative form dominated by the identity, with a monotone nonlinearity, a Lipschitz drift and a trace term along a square-summable sequence in the form space, is degenerate elliptic and strictly proper and satisfies the second-order structure, tail-insensitivity and shift-continuity conditions with explicit moduli, hence comparison.

Statement

In the setting of Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background, the set HH is open in HH by Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background (v); accordingly W=D(A)∩H=D(A)W=D(A)\cap H=D(A) and V∩H=VV\cap H=V there. Let Sym(V)\mathrm{Sym}(V) and Sym(H)\mathrm{Sym}(H), with their orders ⪯\preceq, be as in Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background (vi), let hh be the penalty function, and let N\mathbb{N} be the set of natural numbers.

Let λ0,Cg∈R\lambda_{0},C_{g}\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 0<λ00<\lambda_{0} and 0≤Cg0\le C_{g}, let ωg\omega_{g} be a modulus of continuity, and let g:V→Rg:V\to\mathbb{R} satisfy

∣g(x)∣≤Cgfor every x∈V,∣g(x)−g(y)∣≤ωg(∣x−y∣V)for all x,y∈V.|g(x)|\le C_{g}\quad\text{for every }x\in V,\qquad |g(x)-g(y)|\le\omega_{g}\bigl(|x-y|_{V}\bigr)\quad\text{for all }x,y\in V .

Let B:V→HB:V\to H be a monotone nonlinearity for (H,V,A)(H,V,A), let ℓ∈R\ell\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 0≤ℓ0\le\ell, and let L:H→HL:H\to H be Lipschitz with constant ℓ\ell from (H,dH)(H,d_{H}) to itself. Put cL=∣L(0H)∣Hc_{L}=|L(0_{H})|_{H}.

Let Γ∈Sym(H)\Gamma\in\mathrm{Sym}(H) satisfy 0Sym⪯Γ⪯IH0_{\mathrm{Sym}}\preceq\Gamma\preceq I_{H}, where 0Sym0_{\mathrm{Sym}} and IHI_{H} are the zero and identity forms of Sym(H)\mathrm{Sym}(H) fixed in Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background (vi). Let ν∈R\nu\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 0≤ν0\le\nu, let f=(fk)k∈Nf=(f_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} be square-summable in VV, with sum σ(f)\sigma(f), and let Trf\mathrm{Tr}_{f} be the trace along ff.

Let FF be the function on D(A)×R×H×Sym(V)D(A)\times\mathbb{R}\times H\times\mathrm{Sym}(V) whose value at (x,r,p,X)(x,r,p,X) is

F(x,r,p,X)=λ0 r−ν2 TrfX+12 Γ(p,p)+⟨Ax+B(x)+L(x),p⟩H−g(x),F(x,r,p,X)=\lambda_{0}\,r-\tfrac{\nu}{2}\,\mathrm{Tr}_{f}X+\tfrac12\,\Gamma(p,p)+\langle Ax+B(x)+L(x),p\rangle_{H}-g(x),

which is defined because x∈D(A)x\in D(A) gives x∈Vx\in V and Ax∈HAx\in H by Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background (iii), whence B(x)∈HB(x)\in H and g(x)∈Rg(x)\in\mathbb{R}, and x∈Hx\in H by Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background (i), whence L(x)∈HL(x)\in H, while TrfX∈R\mathrm{Tr}_{f}X\in\mathbb{R} by Square-Summable Sequences in the Form Space of a Hilbert Triple and the Trace of a Form along Them (ii). Then the following hold.

1. (A degenerate elliptic operator) FF is a second-order equation operator on HH relative to (H,V,A)(H,V,A) and is degenerate elliptic.

2. (Strict properness) For every positive R∈RR\in\mathbb{R}, λ0\lambda_{0} is a properness constant for FF at RR; in particular FF is locally strictly proper. No further restriction on λ0\lambda_{0} is imposed anywhere below.

3. (The second-order structure condition) Let ωˉg\bar{\omega}_{g} be the nondecreasing envelope of ωg\omega_{g} truncated at M=2CgM=2C_{g}, which satisfies ωˉg(t)≤2Cg\bar{\omega}_{g}(t)\le2C_{g} for every nonnegative tt by The Nondecreasing Envelope of a Truncated Modulus of Continuity (ii), let ωg∗\omega_{g}^{\ast} be its quadratic reparametrisation at 2Cg2C_{g}, let ω1\omega_{1} be the function on the nonnegative reals with

ω1(t)=ωg∗(t)+ℓ t,\omega_{1}(t)=\omega_{g}^{\ast}(t)+\ell\,t,

and let ω2\omega_{2} be the function with value

ω2(t,α)=(Kα2+ν σ(f)) t\omega_{2}(t,\alpha)=\bigl(K\alpha^{2}+\nu\,\sigma(f)\bigr)\,t

at each pair (t,α)(t,\alpha) of real numbers with 0≤t0\le t and 1<α1<\alpha, where K=64+4cL2+4ℓ2K=64+4c_{L}^{2}+4\ell^{2}. Then ω1\omega_{1} is a modulus of continuity, for every real α>1\alpha>1 the function t↦ω2(t,α)t\mapsto\omega_{2}(t,\alpha) on the nonnegative reals is a modulus of continuity, and for every positive R∈RR\in\mathbb{R} the pair (ω1,ω2)(\omega_{1},\omega_{2}) is a second-order structure pair for FF at RR; in particular FF satisfies the second-order structure condition.

4. (The tail-insensitivity condition) Let (ek)k∈N(e_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} be an orthonormal basis of HH with ek∈Ve_{k}\in V for every k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}. Then FF is tail-insensitive along (ek)k∈N(e_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}}. Consequently, if HH, as a vector space over R\mathbb{R}, is not finite-dimensional, then FF satisfies the tail-insensitivity condition.

5. (The shift-continuity condition) FF satisfies the shift-continuity condition.

6. (Comparison for this operator) Assume in addition that HH, as a vector space over R\mathbb{R}, is not finite-dimensional. Let u,v:H→Ru,v:H\to\mathbb{R} and C∈RC\in\mathbb{R} satisfy u(x)≤Cu(x)\le C and −C≤v(x)-C\le v(x) for every x∈Hx\in H, let uu be a viscosity subsolution of FF on HH and let vv be a viscosity supersolution of FF on HH. Then u(x)≤v(x)u(x)\le v(x) for every x∈Vx\in V.

Taking Γ=θIH\Gamma=\theta I_{H} with 0≤θ≤10\le\theta\le1 gives the operator with quadratic term θ2∣p∣H2\tfrac{\theta}{2}|p|_{H}^{2}, and taking moreover θ=1\theta=1 and ν=0\nu=0 the operator of A Hamilton-Jacobi Operator with a Monotone Nonlinearity and a Lipschitz Perturbation Satisfies the Comparison Hypotheses. The upper bound Γ⪯IH\Gamma\preceq I_{H} keeps the diagonal terms of the δ\delta-shifted quadratic term dominated by the dissipation of the δ\delta-shift of the penalty function; the cross term is what makes ω2\omega_{2} quadratic in α\alpha.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…