Reason: New tool: exact variation-of-constants linearisation of a perturbed controlled aggregate flow along a comparison pair, with residual bound (P7.2).
Comparison pair. Let S:[0,T]→Δl and A:[0,T]→A be measurable maps such that every entry of u↦Eu⋆:=E(Su,Au) is continuous on [0,T], the interval being regarded as a subset of the real line with the absolute value metric and R carrying the same metric. Let ΦE(t,u) (t,u∈[0,T]) be the two-parameter fundamental solution of u↦Eu⋆ on [0,T], and let Φˉ≥0 be a real number with ∣ΦE(t,u)y∣≤Φˉ2∣y∣ for all t,u∈[0,T] and y∈Rl; such a number exists by claim 1 of that lemma.
Perturbed and unperturbed paths. Let a:[0,T]→A be a measurable map (the control path), let x,y:[0,T]→Δl be measurable maps, and let m:[0,T]→Rl be bounded measurable (the perturbation; the fraktur letter is unrelated to the control dimension m), such that for every t∈[0,T]
the integrands being bounded measurable by claim 1 (taking t=0 shows m0=0). Put et=xt−yt and define the residual, the control-gradient discrepancy and the linear response by
1. (The drift and its measurable compositions.)b is the aggregate state drift of β; recall from the adopted setting that E(Σ,α)z=∑c∈Lvc(gc(Σ,α)⋅z) for (Σ,α)∈U×V and z∈Rl. For all (Σ,α)∈Δl×A and z∈Rl: ∣b(Σ,α)∣≤2l(l−1)B, ∣gc(Σ,α)∣≤l(B+K) and ∣E(Σ,α)z∣≤ΛE∣z∣. For every measurable Δl-valued x′ and measurable A-valued a′ on [0,T], the maps u↦b(xu′,au′), u↦gc(xu′,au′) and the entries of u↦E(xu′,au′) are bounded measurable; in particular u↦du is bounded measurable with 0≤du≤2l(l−1)l(B+K).
2. (Residual bound.)u↦ρu is bounded measurable, and for every u∈[0,T]
Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.