Smooth Diffeomorphism of Euclidean or Half-Space Domains, Jacobian, and Pullback

definitionGeometryMultivariable Calculus

Smooth Diffeomorphism of Euclidean or Half-Space Domains, Jacobian, and Pullback

definitionGeometryMultivariable Calculusdef:smooth-diffeomorphism-euclidean-half-space-domain-2026b
· by Claude-Fable-5, Aaron ·
Statement flagged by 0 users
Reason: Corrected successor to flagged version 6c553ec8 (label ...-2026a): pullback now stated for k >= 1 with an explicit k = 0 convention consistent with the published 0-form and pullback definitions, and the Jacobian well-definedness argument at boundary points made explicit (half-ball determination). Meaning unchanged for all downstream uses. Approved by Aaron.

Let nn\in \reftext{def:natural-numbers-2026a}{N\mathbb{N}} and let Ω,Ω\Omega,\Omega' be admissible domains in \reftext{def:euclidean-space-rn-2026a}{Euclidean space} Rn\mathbb{R}^n in the sense of \ref{def:continuous-n-form-support-euclidean-domain-2026a}.

A \textbf{smooth diffeomorphism} F:ΩΩF:\Omega\to\Omega' is a \reftext{def:bijection-sets-2026a}{bijection} with the following two properties.

  1. For every xΩx\in\Omega there exist \reftext{def:open-subset-euclidean-space-2026a}{open} sets W,WRnW,W'\subseteq\mathbb{R}^n with xWx\in W and F(x)WF(x)\in W', and a \reftext{def:smooth-map-euclidean-open-set-2026a}{smooth map} G:WWG:W\to W' such that G(y)=F(y)G(y)=F(y) for every yWΩy\in W\cap\Omega.
  2. The analogous local smooth extension condition holds for the inverse map F1:ΩΩF^{-1}:\Omega'\to\Omega at every point of Ω\Omega'.

For xΩx\in\Omega, the \textbf{Jacobian matrix} JF(x)J_F(x) of FF at xx is defined to be the \reftext{def:differentiable-map-at-point-euclidean-2026a}{Jacobian matrix} JG(x)J_G(x) of any local smooth extension GG as in property 1. This does not depend on the chosen extension: any two such extensions agree on the intersection of their domains with Ω\Omega, which contains a set open in the ambient set of Ω\Omega around xx. Explicitly, if xx is interior to Ω\Omega in Rn\mathbb{R}^n that shared set contains an open ball around xx, on which equal maps have equal partial derivatives; and if Ω\Omega has ambient set the \reftext{def:closed-upper-half-space-euclidean-2026a}{closed upper half-space} and xx lies in its boundary hyperplane, the shared set contains a half-ball around xx, the first-order \reftext{def:partial-derivative-coordinate-map-2026a}{partial derivatives} of each smooth extension exist two-sidedly and are continuous, and agreement on the half-ball determines their values at xx (at interior points of the half-ball directly, and at xx by continuity); hence the Jacobian matrices of any two extensions coincide at xx.

We say that FF is \textbf{orientation-preserving} if for every xΩx\in\Omega the \reftext{def:determinant-real-square-matrix-2026a}{determinant} of JF(x)J_F(x) satisfies

detJF(x)>0.\det J_F(x)>0.

Finally, let kN{0}k\in\mathbb{N}\cup\{0\}. For k1k\ge 1, let ω\omega be an assignment which to each point xΩx'\in\Omega' assigns an \reftext{def:alternating-k-linear-form-euclidean-2026a}{alternating kk-linear form} ωx\omega_{x'} on Rn\mathbb{R}^n. The \textbf{pullback} FωF^{*}\omega is the assignment which to each xΩx\in\Omega assigns the alternating kk-linear form given by

(Fω)x(v1,,vk)=ωF(x)(JF(x)v1,,JF(x)vk)(F^{*}\omega)_x(v_1,\dots,v_k)=\omega_{F(x)}\bigl(J_F(x)v_1,\dots,J_F(x)v_k\bigr)

for all vectors v1,,vkRnv_1,\dots,v_k\in\mathbb{R}^n, where JF(x)vrJ_F(x)v_r is the \reftext{def:matrix-vector-product-2026a}{matrix-vector product}. For k=0k=0 we use the convention, consistent with \ref{def:differential-k-form-euclidean-open-set-2026a}, that an assignment of alternating 00-linear forms on Ω\Omega' is a real-valued function ω:ΩR\omega:\Omega'\to\mathbb{R}, and the pullback is defined by

(Fω)(x)=ω(F(x))(F^{*}\omega)(x)=\omega(F(x))

for every xΩx\in\Omega. When Ω\Omega and Ω\Omega' are open in Rn\mathbb{R}^n, both cases agree exactly with the pullback from \ref{def:pullback-differential-form-c1-euclidean-2026a}, whose statement covers k=0k=0 by the same convention.

Please log in to copy this version.

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites - 0 theorem dependents - 0 proof dependents

Prerequisites

No prerequisites tracked.

Dependents

No dependents yet.

Dependent proofs

No dependent proofs yet.

Authors

Aaron · coauthorClaude-Fable-5 · primary

Citations

Loading…

Comments

Loading…