TheoremBase

Maximisers of the Doubled Difference Penalised by the Wall-Confined Free Energy on Bounded Noncommutative Laws

For bounded semicontinuous u and v the doubled difference penalised by the squared distance and the wall-confined free energy attains its maximum, the maximum decreases in the doubling strength with the usual gain, and it tends to the unpenalised supremum as the penalty weight vanishes.

Statement

In the setting of The Discounted Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall on Noncommutative Laws: Standing Notation, let E:D→R\mathcal{E}:\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} be as in The Discounted Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall on Noncommutative Laws: Standing Notation §free-energy, and assume D≠∅\mathcal{D}\ne\varnothing. Fix a real ee with e≤E(λ)e\le\mathcal{E}(\lambda) for every λ∈D\lambda\in\mathcal{D}, as provided by The Wall-Confined Free Energy: Norm Bound, Lower Bound, Weak-Star Compact Sublevel Sets and Displacement Monotonicity of the Score §bounds. Let u,v:Σd2→Ru,v:\Sigma^{2}_{d}\to\mathbb{R}, let b≥0b\ge0 be real with ∣u(λ)∣≤b|u(\lambda)|\le b and ∣v(λ)∣≤b|v(\lambda)|\le b for every λ∈Σd2\lambda\in\Sigma^{2}_{d}, and let uu be weak-star upper semicontinuous on bounded laws and vv weak-star lower semicontinuous on bounded laws. For reals δ≥0\delta\ge0 and α>0\alpha>0 let Ψδ,α:D×D→R\Psi_{\delta,\alpha}:\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} be

Ψδ,α(μ,ν)=u(κd(μ))−v(κd(ν))−α2W2(μ,ν)2−δ E(μ)−δ E(ν).\Psi_{\delta,\alpha}(\mu,\nu)=u\bigl(\kappa_{d}(\mu)\bigr)-v\bigl(\kappa_{d}(\nu)\bigr)-\tfrac{\alpha}{2}W_{2}(\mu,\nu)^{2}-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\mu)-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu).

1. (Bounds) For all reals δ≥0\delta\ge0 and α>0\alpha>0, every value of Ψδ,α\Psi_{\delta,\alpha} is at most 2b−2δe2b-2\delta e, and the supremum S(δ,α)S(\delta,\alpha) of the values of Ψδ,α\Psi_{\delta,\alpha} is a real number; moreover S(δ,α)≤S(0,α)−2δeS(\delta,\alpha)\le S(0,\alpha)-2\delta e.

2. (Diagonal) For every real α>0\alpha>0, S(0,α)≥u(κd(λ))−v(κd(λ))S(0,\alpha)\ge u(\kappa_{d}(\lambda))-v(\kappa_{d}(\lambda)) for every λ∈D\lambda\in\mathcal{D}.

3. (Monotone in the strength) S(0,α′)≥S(0,α)S(0,\alpha')\ge S(0,\alpha) for all reals α,α′\alpha,\alpha' with 0<α′≤α0<\alpha'\le\alpha.

4. (Maximiser) For all reals δ>0\delta>0 and α>0\alpha>0 there is (μ^,ν^)∈D×D(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu})\in\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D} with Ψδ,α(μ^,ν^)=S(δ,α)\Psi_{\delta,\alpha}(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu})=S(\delta,\alpha), called a maximising pair of Ψδ,α\Psi_{\delta,\alpha}.

5. (Doubling strength) If δ>0\delta>0, 0<α′<α0<\alpha'<\alpha and (μ^,ν^)(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu}) is a maximising pair of Ψδ,α\Psi_{\delta,\alpha}, then

S(δ,α)+α−α′2 W2(μ^,ν^)2≤S(δ,α′).S(\delta,\alpha)+\tfrac{\alpha-\alpha'}{2}\,W_{2}(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu})^{2}\le S(\delta,\alpha').

6. (Vanishing weight) For all reals α>0\alpha>0 and ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is a real δ1>0\delta_{1}>0 with S(δ,α)≥S(0,α)−εS(\delta,\alpha)\ge S(0,\alpha)-\varepsilon for every real δ\delta with 0<δ≤δ10<\delta\le\delta_{1}.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…