TheoremBase

Integer Power Products of Causal-Intensity Likelihoods: Pathwise Identity, Integral Bounds, and the Pair Identity

Statement

Let l~≥1\tilde{l}\ge1 be a natural number, let T>0T>0 be a real number, and let (R,R,ρ)(\mathbf{R},\mathcal{R},\rho) be the observation record space with horizon TT and l~\tilde{l} channels, with channel set VV. Causal intensities on R\mathbf{R}, their total intensities and their likelihoods are as in those definitions; for a causal intensity μ\mu write ΛT(r)=∫[0,T]μstot(r) ds\Lambda_T(r)=\int_{[0,T]}\mu^{\mathrm{tot}}_s(r)\,ds (the Lebesgue integral over [0,T][0,T]), which is R\mathcal{R}-measurable in rr by claim 2 of Survival Identity, Measurability, Event-Count Recursion, and Normalization of the Likelihood of a Causal Intensity. Integrals over R\mathbf{R} are those of Lebesgue Integral of a Nonnegative Measurable Function, exp⁡\exp is the real exponential function, and for a real x>0x>0 and an integer θ\theta the power xθx^{\theta} is the finite product of θ\theta copies of xx if θ≥1\theta\ge1, 11 if θ=0\theta=0, and 1/x−θ1/x^{-\theta} if θ≤−1\theta\le-1 (for x≥0x\ge0 and θ≥0\theta\ge0 the same reading applies).

Products over a subset of the index range, such as ∏i:θi>0\prod_{i:\theta_i>0}, mean the product over 1,…,n1,\dots,n with the omitted factors replaced by 11; an empty product is 11.

1. (Power product) Let n≥1n\ge1 be a natural number, let μ1,…,μn\mu_1,\dots,\mu_n be causal intensities on R\mathbf{R} with bounds μˉ1,…,μˉn\bar\mu_1,\dots,\bar\mu_n, written μi=(μiυ)υ∈V\mu_i=(\mu^\upsilon_i)_{\upsilon\in V} with μi,sυ(r)=μiυ(s,r)\mu^\upsilon_{i,s}(r)=\mu^\upsilon_i(s,r), and let θ1,…,θn\theta_1,\dots,\theta_n be integers. Assume there is a real μ‾>0\underline\mu>0 such that μi,sυ(r)≥μ‾\mu^\upsilon_{i,s}(r)\ge\underline\mu for all ss, rr, υ\upsilon and every ii with θi<0\theta_i<0. Define μ~=(μ~υ)υ∈V\tilde\mu=(\tilde\mu^\upsilon)_{\upsilon\in V} by μ~sυ(r)=∏i=1n(μi,sυ(r))θi,\tilde\mu^\upsilon_s(r)=\prod_{i=1}^{n}\bigl(\mu^\upsilon_{i,s}(r)\bigr)^{\theta_i}, and E:R→RE:\mathbf{R}\to\mathbb{R} by E(r)=Λ~T(r)−∑i=1nθiΛi,T(r)E(r)=\tilde\Lambda_T(r)-\sum_{i=1}^{n}\theta_i\Lambda_{i,T}(r), where Λ~T\tilde\Lambda_T and Λi,T\Lambda_{i,T} are the integrated total intensities of μ~\tilde\mu and μi\mu_i. Then μ~\tilde\mu is a causal intensity on R\mathbf{R} with bound μ~ˉ=∏i:θi>0μˉiθi∏i:θi<0μ‾θi\bar{\tilde\mu}=\prod_{i:\theta_i>0}\bar\mu_i^{\theta_i}\prod_{i:\theta_i<0}\underline\mu^{\theta_i}; EE is R\mathcal{R}-measurable with ∣E(r)∣≤l~T(μ~ˉ+∑i=1n∣θi∣μˉi)|E(r)|\le\tilde{l}T\bigl(\bar{\tilde\mu}+\sum_{i=1}^{n}|\theta_i|\bar\mu_i\bigr); for every ii with θi<0\theta_i<0 the likelihood ℓμi\ell_{\mu_i} is strictly positive; and for every r∈Rr\in\mathbf{R}, ∏i=1nℓμi(r)θi=ℓμ~(r)exp⁡(E(r)).\prod_{i=1}^{n}\ell_{\mu_i}(r)^{\theta_i}=\ell_{\tilde\mu}(r)\exp\bigl(E(r)\bigr).

2. (Integral bounds) In the setting of claim 1, the function r↦∏i=1nℓμi(r)θir\mapsto\prod_{i=1}^{n}\ell_{\mu_i}(r)^{\theta_i} is R\mathcal{R}-measurable and nonnegative, and if E‾\underline E and Eˉ\bar E are real numbers with E‾≤E(r)≤Eˉ\underline E\le E(r)\le\bar E for every r∈Rr\in\mathbf{R}, then exp⁡(E‾)≤∫R∏i=1nℓμiθi dρ≤exp⁡(Eˉ).\exp(\underline E)\le\int_{\mathbf{R}}\prod_{i=1}^{n}\ell_{\mu_i}^{\theta_i}\,d\rho\le\exp(\bar E). In particular, if EE is constant with value E0E_0, the integral equals exp⁡(E0)\exp(E_0).

3. (Pair identity) Let μ,μ′,μ′′\mu,\mu',\mu'' be causal intensities on R\mathbf{R} with bounds μˉ,μˉ′,μˉ′′\bar\mu,\bar\mu',\bar\mu'', and assume there is a real μ‾>0\underline\mu>0 with μsυ(r)≥μ‾\mu^\upsilon_s(r)\ge\underline\mu for all s,r,υs,r,\upsilon. Then claim 1 applies to (μ,μ′,μ′′)(\mu,\mu',\mu'') with exponents (−1,1,1)(-1,1,1), giving μ~υ=μ′υμ′′υ/μυ\tilde\mu^\upsilon=\mu'^\upsilon\mu''^\upsilon/\mu^\upsilon and E(r)=∫[0,T]∑υ∈V(μs′υ(r)−μsυ(r))(μs′′υ(r)−μsυ(r))μsυ(r) ds;E(r)=\int_{[0,T]}\sum_{\upsilon\in V}\frac{\bigl(\mu'^\upsilon_s(r)-\mu^\upsilon_s(r)\bigr)\bigl(\mu''^\upsilon_s(r)-\mu^\upsilon_s(r)\bigr)}{\mu^\upsilon_s(r)}\,ds ; moreover ℓμ>0\ell_\mu>0, the likelihood ratios L′=ℓμ′/ℓμL'=\ell_{\mu'}/\ell_\mu and L′′=ℓμ′′/ℓμL''=\ell_{\mu''}/\ell_\mu are measurable, the functions ℓμ\ell_\mu, ℓμ′\ell_{\mu'}, ℓμ′′\ell_{\mu''}, ℓμ′ℓμ′′/ℓμ\ell_{\mu'}\ell_{\mu''}/\ell_\mu and ℓμ(1−L′)(1−L′′)\ell_\mu(1-L')(1-L'') are integrable with respect to ρ\rho, and ∫Rℓμ (1−L′)(1−L′′) dρ=∫Rℓμ′ℓμ′′ℓμ dρ−1.\int_{\mathbf{R}}\ell_\mu\,(1-L')(1-L'')\,d\rho=\int_{\mathbf{R}}\frac{\ell_{\mu'}\ell_{\mu''}}{\ell_\mu}\,d\rho-1 .

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…