TheoremBase

Well-Posedness of the Hamilton-Jacobi Equation with Penalty Drift on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Comparison, Existence and Uniqueness of a Bounded Viscosity Solution

For a displacement convex, noise-closed noise penalty pair with closed score and regular penalised maxima whose penalty domain has the noise map property and whose penalty controls the squared distance to the reference measure, and for a bounded uniformly continuous running cost and control cost in (0,1], the penalty-drift Hamilton-Jacobi equation satisfies comparison and has exactly one bounded viscosity solution, bounded by the sup of the cost over the discount.

Statement

In the settings of The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background and First-Order Equations on the Noise Wasserstein Space Relative to a Noise Penalty Pair: Standing Notation, let (D,DΣ,E,Σ)(\mathcal{D},\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma},\mathcal{E},\Sigma) be a noise penalty pair on Pρa\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}, and let ∣s∣|s| denote the absolute value of s∈Rs\in\mathbb{R}. For μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D} the number Wa(μ,ρ)W_{a}(\mu,\rho) is a nonnegative real number, because D⊆Pρa\mathcal{D}\subseteq\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} by Noise Penalty Pairs on the Noise Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains §pair and ρ∈Pρa\rho\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} by The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §reference. Assume the following.

(The pair) The pair is noise-closed, has closed score along noise couplings, has regular penalised maxima and is displacement convex; its penalty domain D\mathcal{D} has the noise map property of The Noise Map Property of a Set of Probability Measures §map-property; and there is K∈RK\in\mathbb{R} with

Wa(μ,ρ)2≤K (1+∣E(μ)∣)for every μ∈D.W_{a}(\mu,\rho)^{2}\le K\,\bigl(1+|\mathcal{E}(\mu)|\bigr)\qquad\text{for every }\mu\in\mathcal{D}.

(The data) λ0,θ∈R\lambda_{0},\theta\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 0<λ00<\lambda_{0} and 0<θ≤10<\theta\le1, and g:D→Rg:\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} is bounded and uniformly continuous on D\mathcal{D}, relative to D\mathcal{D} in the metric space (Pρa,Wa)(\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho},W_{a}) of First-Order Equations on the Noise Wasserstein Space Relative to a Noise Penalty Pair: Standing Notation §space and with R\mathbb{R} carrying the metric of The Absolute Value Metric on the Real Line: for every positive ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} there is a positive γ∈R\gamma\in\mathbb{R} with ∣g(μ)−g(ν)∣<ε|g(\mu)-g(\nu)|<\varepsilon for all μ,ν∈D\mu,\nu\in\mathcal{D} with Wa(μ,ν)<γW_{a}(\mu,\nu)<\gamma. Fix C∈RC\in\mathbb{R} with 0≤C0\le C and ∣g(μ)∣≤C|g(\mu)|\le C for every μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}; such a CC exists, since if C′C' bounds ∣g∣|g| on D\mathcal{D} as in Bounded Real-Valued Function on a Set, the larger of C′C' and 00 serves.

Viscosity subsolutions, supersolutions and solutions are those of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation with penalty drift on the noise Wasserstein space of the pair, with discount λ0\lambda_{0}, control cost θ\theta and running cost gg, read as in that clause through Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a First-Order Equation on the Noise Wasserstein Space Relative to a Noise Penalty Pair §subsolution, Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a First-Order Equation on the Noise Wasserstein Space Relative to a Noise Penalty Pair §supersolution and Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a First-Order Equation on the Noise Wasserstein Space Relative to a Noise Penalty Pair §solution.

1. (Comparison) Let u,v:D→Ru,v:\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} and b,b′∈Rb,b'\in\mathbb{R} satisfy u(μ)≤bu(\mu)\le b and b′≤v(μ)b'\le v(\mu) for every μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}; the pair being noise-closed by (The pair), Basic Properties of the Delta-Envelopes on the Noise Wasserstein Space, and the Envelopes of Bounded Functions for a Noise-Closed Penalty Pair §growth shows that uu has penalty-subordinate growth from above and vv from below. Let uu be a viscosity subsolution and vv a viscosity supersolution. Then u(μ)≤v(μ)u(\mu)\le v(\mu) for every μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}.

2. (Existence) There is a viscosity solution u:D→Ru:\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} with, λ0−1\lambda_{0}^{-1} denoting the multiplicative inverse of λ0\lambda_{0},

−λ0−1C≤u(μ)≤λ0−1Cfor every μ∈D.-\lambda_{0}^{-1}C\le u(\mu)\le\lambda_{0}^{-1}C\qquad\text{for every }\mu\in\mathcal{D}.

3. (Uniqueness) Let u,u′:D→Ru,u':\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} be viscosity solutions, each bounded. Then u(μ)=u′(μ)u(\mu)=u'(\mu) for every μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}. Consequently, together with claim 2, the equation has exactly one bounded viscosity solution u:D→Ru:\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R}.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…