Cost Limit Along the Approximate Kalman Policy
propositionProbabilityprop:kalman-policy-cost-limit-2026cAdopt the setting, hypotheses (H1)--(H4) and (C), and notation of the approximate Kalman filter and policy lemma — in particular the clamp indicator of its conclusion 4(a) — together with hypothesis (H5) of the filter error covariance lemma, namely that there is a real such that every with lies in the control set , for every . Assume moreover that is convex, as required by the cost expansion and completion-of-squares theorems and the filter error covariance lemma invoked in the proof; together with (C) and the boundedness of the control-side open set of the transition-rate extension, which contains , this makes a closed, bounded, convex subset of . Throughout, a real-valued function on a subinterval of the real numbers is called continuous on when it is continuous relative to , both and the codomain carrying the metric of the real line. All of this is taken for the fluctuation LQG data of the stationary mean-field triple , whose stationary co-state has components (, ): in particular the cost extension of the population cost data is part of the data, the family is the Riccati family of (H2), , is symmetric positive definite with continuous inverse (conclusion 1), is the state noise covariance of the LQG data, is the matrix of (H4), and is the filter covariance of conclusion 2. For each natural number , let be the approximate Kalman policy at level , fix an -agent driving system and a projected solution as in conclusion 4 of the policy lemma --- a solution of the controlled -agent dynamics for , , and --- with empirical state measure , approximate Kalman control , approximate Kalman filter , fluctuation processes and , and filter error with filter error covariance . Let be the -agent cost of this solution, let be the mean-field cost, and set with the componentwise expectation, as in the second-order cost expansion. For real matrices and with rows and columns write
and adopt the entry notation , , of the completion-of-squares theorem. Assume the two initial-condition hypotheses:
(I1) for all , as ;
(I2) .
Then the map is continuous on , each is a well-defined real number, and
the integral being the Lebesgue integral over the compact interval of the continuous integrand (which agrees with its Riemann integral by claim 3 of that toolkit).
Loading…
Prerequisites
No prerequisites tracked.
Dependents
No dependents yet.
Dependent proofs
No dependent proofs yet.
No relations recorded yet.