TheoremBase

Intrinsic Test Functions at a Maximiser of the Wasserstein-Doubled Difference

At a maximiser of the Wasserstein-doubled difference of the delta-envelopes of two bounded functions over a penalty domain with the map property, there is a maximising pair and a pair of matrices admitted by Ishii's lemma such that each side is touched, arbitrarily close by, by intrinsic test functions whose gradients approach the optimal displacements of that pair along couplings and whose translation Hessians approach the two matrices. The proof splits the squared distance at the displacement midpoint and applies Ishii's lemma to the mean-fibre envelopes.

Statement

In the setting of The Intrinsic Calculus on the Wasserstein Space: Standing Notation, let (D,DΣ,E,Σ)(\mathcal{D},\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma},\mathcal{E},\Sigma) be a Wasserstein-coercive penalty pair on P2(Rd)\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) whose penalty domain D\mathcal{D} has the map property. Local maxima and local minima relative to D\mathcal{D}, are understood in the metric space (P2(Rd),W2)(\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),W_{2}) of Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation (i). Intrinsic test functions φ\varphi on D\mathcal{D}, their gradients along couplings ∇φ(ρ)∈L2(ρ;Rd)\nabla\varphi(\rho)\in L^{2}(\rho;\mathbb{R}^{d}) and their translation Hessians Hφ(ρ)∈S(d)H_{\varphi}(\rho)\in\mathcal{S}(d) at ρ∈D\rho\in\mathcal{D} are those of that definition; the cost I(π)I(\pi) of a coupling and the discrepancy of two fields along it are those of The Intrinsic Calculus on the Wasserstein Space: Standing Notation (i); and that a pair of members of S(d)\mathcal{S}(d) is admitted at α\alpha is the condition of that clause.

Let u,v:D→Ru,v:\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} and b,b′∈Rb,b'\in\mathbb{R} satisfy u(σ)≤bu(\sigma)\le b and b′≤v(σ)b'\le v(\sigma) for every σ∈D\sigma\in\mathcal{D}. Let δ∈R\delta\in\mathbb{R} be positive; by The Delta-Envelopes of Bounded Functions and Their Monotonicity in the Weight, for a Wasserstein-Closed Penalty Pair (i), uu has penalty-subordinate growth from above and vv from below, so that the δ\delta-envelopes uδ−u^{-}_{\delta} of uu and vδ+v^{+}_{\delta} of vv, functions on D\mathcal{D}, are defined. Let α∈R\alpha\in\mathbb{R} be positive, let Ψ:D×D→R\Psi:\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} have value

Ψ(μ,ν)=uδ−(μ)−vδ+(ν)−α2 W2(μ,ν)2,\Psi(\mu,\nu)=u^{-}_{\delta}(\mu)-v^{+}_{\delta}(\nu)-\tfrac{\alpha}{2}\,W_{2}(\mu,\nu)^{2},

where α2\tfrac{\alpha}{2} is the product of α\alpha with the multiplicative inverse of 22 (claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field), and let (μ^,ν^)∈D×D(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu})\in\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D} satisfy Ψ(μ,ν)≤Ψ(μ^,ν^)\Psi(\mu,\nu)\le\Psi(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu}) for all (μ,ν)∈D×D(\mu,\nu)\in\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D}.

Then there are ρ∗,σ∗∈D\rho^{*},\sigma^{*}\in\mathcal{D} and X,Y∈S(d)\mathbb{X},\mathbb{Y}\in\mathcal{S}(d) with the properties below. Since D\mathcal{D} has the map property and ρ∗,σ∗∈D\rho^{*},\sigma^{*}\in\mathcal{D}, both ordered pairs (ρ∗,σ∗)(\rho^{*},\sigma^{*}) and (σ∗,ρ∗)(\sigma^{*},\rho^{*}) are uniquely mapped; SS denotes an optimal map from ρ∗\rho^{*} to σ∗\sigma^{*} and S′S' an optimal map from σ∗\sigma^{*} to ρ∗\rho^{*}, and the classes id−S∈L2(ρ∗;Rd)\mathrm{id}-S\in L^{2}(\rho^{*};\mathbb{R}^{d}) and id−S′∈L2(σ∗;Rd)\mathrm{id}-S'\in L^{2}(\sigma^{*};\mathbb{R}^{d}) are supplied by The Optimal Map as a Square-Integrable Vector Field: Integrability, Transport Cost and Uniqueness of the Class (i) and do not depend on these choices by The Optimal Map as a Square-Integrable Vector Field: Integrability, Transport Cost and Uniqueness of the Class (iii).

1. (A maximising pair) Ψ(ρ∗,σ∗)=Ψ(μ^,ν^)\Psi(\rho^{*},\sigma^{*})=\Psi(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu}).

2. (Admitted matrices) The pair (X,Y)(\mathbb{X},\mathbb{Y}) is admitted at α\alpha.

3. (Test functions for the subsolution side) For every positive ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} there are ρ∈D\rho\in\mathcal{D}, an intrinsic test function φ\varphi on D\mathcal{D} such that the function D→R\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} with value uδ−(ρ′)−φ(ρ′)u^{-}_{\delta}(\rho')-\varphi(\rho') at ρ′\rho' has a local maximum relative to D\mathcal{D} at ρ\rho, and π∈Π(ρ,ρ∗)\pi\in\Pi(\rho,\rho^{*}) with

I(π)<ε2,∣uδ−(ρ)−uδ−(ρ∗)∣<ε,∫Rd+d∥∇φ(ρ)(x)−α(y−S(y))∥2 π(dz)<ε2,∥Hφ(ρ)−X∥<ε.I(\pi)<\varepsilon^{2},\qquad\bigl|u^{-}_{\delta}(\rho)-u^{-}_{\delta}(\rho^{*})\bigr|<\varepsilon,\qquad\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}\bigl\lVert\nabla\varphi(\rho)(x)-\alpha\bigl(y-S(y)\bigr)\bigr\rVert^{2}\,\pi(dz)<\varepsilon^{2},\qquad\lVert H_{\varphi}(\rho)-\mathbb{X}\rVert<\varepsilon .

4. (Test functions for the supersolution side) For every positive ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} there are σ∈D\sigma\in\mathcal{D}, an intrinsic test function ψ\psi on D\mathcal{D} such that the function D→R\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} with value vδ+(σ′)−ψ(σ′)v^{+}_{\delta}(\sigma')-\psi(\sigma') at σ′\sigma' has a local minimum relative to D\mathcal{D} at σ\sigma, and γ∈Π(σ,σ∗)\gamma\in\Pi(\sigma,\sigma^{*}) with

I(γ)<ε2,∣vδ+(σ)−vδ+(σ∗)∣<ε,∫Rd+d∥∇ψ(σ)(x)−α(S′(y)−y)∥2 γ(dz)<ε2,∥Hψ(σ)−Y∥<ε.I(\gamma)<\varepsilon^{2},\qquad\bigl|v^{+}_{\delta}(\sigma)-v^{+}_{\delta}(\sigma^{*})\bigr|<\varepsilon,\qquad\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}\bigl\lVert\nabla\psi(\sigma)(x)-\alpha\bigl(S'(y)-y\bigr)\bigr\rVert^{2}\,\gamma(dz)<\varepsilon^{2},\qquad\lVert H_{\psi}(\sigma)-\mathbb{Y}\rVert<\varepsilon .

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…