Reason: First publication. Anchored envelope and restricted moment bounds for the state fluctuation at a given anchor and level, as used at each block of the cascade.
Statement
Adopt the setting, notation, hypotheses and definitions of the pre-stopping envelope lemma: the affine-controlled transition-rate family(β0,β1) on l states with compact convex control set A⊆Rm, its transition-rate familyβ with rate bound B and state-Lipschitz constant Λb, the horizon T>0, the solution of the controlled N-agent dynamics with N agents, regular event Ω0, empirical state measure Σ, observation filtration (Gt)t∈[0,T] and system filtration (Ftsys)t∈[0,T], the realized control α^, the point x0∈Δl of the probability simplex, the realized mean-field flow Φ, the mean-field trajectory pair(S,A) with control A, initial state S0=x0 and S∗=S, the deviation Yt=∣Φt−St∗∣ — ∣⋅∣ being the Euclidean norm and ⋅ the nonnegative square root — the energy E, the reals cE>0, δ>0, θout>0 and the clipped-out time O of the extended good-set stopping-time lemma adopted there, the martingale part M=(M1,…,Ml) with the nondecreasing integrals Mt of claim 1 of the pathwise tracking lemma adopted there (only claims 1 and 2 of that lemma are used here, so its population cost data may be taken arbitrary (for instance identically zero, which is convex in the control) and its hypothesis (LipC) is not assumed), the state fluctuation processst=N(Σt−St), the constants cM, κT, KM, κ0 and cQ, and the random variablesM, I and Q≥0, so that E[Q4]≤cQκ0N−2 by claim 2 of the pre-stopping envelope lemma, E being the expectation. The barrier εY>0 of the pre-stopping envelope lemma and its stopping time τ∗ play no role in the conclusions below.
Fix a real number t0∈[0,T] and a real number ε1, and let σY, σE, σout and the anchored good-set clock σ∗=min(σY,σE,σout) be as in the anchored good-set clocks lemma, applied to the same data — the same transition-rate family, horizon, solution, realized control, flow Φ, map S∗=S, deviation Y, map A, energy E, reals δ, θout, cE, clipped-out time O, and point x0 — with the anchor t0 and the level ε1. Write 1D for the function equal to 1 on a set D and 0 off it.
Then the following hold.
1. (Anchored envelope.) For every ω∈Ω0 with Yt0(ω)<ε1 and every t∈[t0,T], writing u=min(t,σ∗(ω)),
in particular 1{t<σ∗}(ω)∣st(ω)∣≤N(ε1+Q(ω)) for every t∈[t0,T] and every ω∈Ω0 with Yt0(ω)<ε1.
2. (Measurability.) For all s,t∈[t0,T] the functions 1Ω0∣smin(t,σ∗)∣2 (with smin(t,σ∗) the componentwise sampled function, smin(t,σ∗)γ(ω)=smin(t,σ∗(ω))γ(ω)) and 1Ω01{s<σ∗}∣ss∣2 are random variables; moreover {Yt0<ε1}∈Gt0.
3. (Restricted second and fourth moments.) For all s,t∈[t0,T] and every event D∈F with D⊆{Yt0<ε1},
Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.