TheoremBase

The Separation Theorem over Extended Admissible Controls

Statement

Consider a linear-Gaussian state-observation model on [0,T][0,T], a control dimension k≥1k\ge1, a control matrix assignment BB, and cost data Q,V,R,FQ,V,R,F with every R(t)R(t) positive definite. Suppose ZZ is a symmetric continuous solution of the backward Riccati equation, and let Γ\Gamma be the feedback gain, both as in Completion of Squares for the Linear-Quadratic-Gaussian Cost, and let V∗V^{*} be the optimal value defined in The Separation Theorem for Partial-Information Linear-Quadratic-Gaussian Control. Adopt the notation B[0,T]\mathcal{B}_{[0,T]}, λ[0,T]\lambda_{[0,T]} and the co-null terminology of Almost-Everywhere Mean-Square Limits of Cauchy Sequences of Admissible Controls, from the restricted Lebesgue measure on [0,T][0,T].

For each extended admissible control α\alpha with values in Rk\mathbb{R}^{k}, let XαX^{\alpha} be its controlled state, J[α]J[\alpha] its cost, and X^=X^(α)\widehat X=\widehat X(\alpha) its extended controlled estimator, and define

φα(t):=E[(αt−Γ(t)X^t)⋅(R(t)(αt−Γ(t)X^t))](0≤t≤T),\varphi_{\alpha}(t):=\mathbb{E}\Bigl[\bigl(\alpha_t-\Gamma(t)\widehat X_t\bigr)\cdot\Bigl(R(t)\bigl(\alpha_t-\Gamma(t)\widehat X_t\bigr)\Bigr)\Bigr]\qquad(0\le t\le T),

with the expectation, the dot product and matrix-vector product applied componentwise to tuples of random variables, and differences of tuples formed componentwise; each φα(t)\varphi_{\alpha}(t) is defined and finite by claim 1 of Expected Bilinear Forms: Trace Formula and Mean-Square Continuity, and nonnegative because every R(t)R(t) is positive definite, so the random variable inside the expectation is nonnegative pointwise. Then:

1. (Extended cost representation) For every extended admissible control α\alpha and every approximating sequence ((α(n)),D)\bigl((\alpha^{(n)}),D\bigr) for α\alpha: the function 1D φα\mathbf{1}_D\,\varphi_{\alpha} is B[0,T]\mathcal{B}_{[0,T]}-measurable with finite Lebesgue integral, this integral does not depend on the choice of approximating sequence, and

J[α]=V∗+∫[0,T]1D φα dλ[0,T].J[\alpha]=V^{*}+\int_{[0,T]}\mathbf{1}_D\,\varphi_{\alpha}\,d\lambda_{[0,T]} .

2. (Optimality criterion) For every extended admissible control α\alpha: J[α]≥V∗J[\alpha]\ge V^{*}, with equality if and only if there is a co-null set D0∈B[0,T]D_0\in\mathcal{B}_{[0,T]} such that for every t∈D0t\in D_0, componentwise, αt=Γ(t)X^t(α)\alpha_t=\Gamma(t)\widehat X_t(\alpha) almost surely.

3. (Attainment) The closed-loop feedback control α∗\alpha^{*} of Existence and Self-Consistency of the Closed-Loop Feedback Control is admissible, hence extended admissible by claim 1 of Convergence of Corrections and Costs along Approximating Sequences of an Extended Admissible Control, and J[α∗]=V∗J[\alpha^{*}]=V^{*}. In particular V∗V^{*} is the minimum of JJ over all extended admissible controls with values in Rk\mathbb{R}^{k}, and enlarging the class from admissible to extended admissible controls does not lower the optimal value.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…