TheoremBase

Law Identity between the N-Agent Aggregate Path with Its Observation Record and the Synthetic Copy's Regularised Path with Its Record

Statement

Adopt the setting and notation of The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record, with the probability space of that lemma renamed (Ω♭,F♭,P♭)(\Omega^\flat,\mathcal{F}^\flat,P^\flat): natural numbers N≥1N\ge1, l≥2l\ge2, m≥1m\ge1, l~≥1\tilde{l}\ge1; a nonempty control set A⊆Rm\mathcal{A}\subseteq\mathbb{R}^m in Euclidean space; real numbers B≥0B\ge0, B~≥0\tilde{B}\ge0 and T>0T>0; a transition-rate family β\beta with control set A\mathcal{A} and rate bound BB; an observation-rate family β~\tilde{\beta} with rate bound B~\tilde{B}, its aggregate observation drift b~=(b~υ)\tilde{b}=(\tilde{b}^\upsilon) and the total observation rate b~tot=∑υ=1l~b~υ\tilde{b}^{\mathrm{tot}}=\sum_{\upsilon=1}^{\tilde{l}}\tilde{b}^\upsilon on the probability simplex Δl\Delta^l; the aggregate lattice GN⊆Δl\mathbb{G}_N\subseteq\Delta^l and the point x0∈GNx_0\in\mathbb{G}_N; the observation record space (R,R,ρ)(\mathbf{R},\mathcal{R},\rho) with horizon TT and l~\tilde{l} channels, records written r=(k,t,v)r=(k,\mathbf{t},v) with t=(t1,…,tk)\mathbf{t}=(t_1,\dots,t_k) and v=(v1,…,vk)v=(v_1,\dots,v_k); an A\mathcal{A}-valued observation-driven control policy hh with record-frozen control paths ara^r; the real number RR, for which we assume the strict inequality R>NBTR>NBT; the cells, the index set L\mathsf{L}, the dimension dd, the smoothing parameter η\eta (a real number occurring only as the subscript of the Gaussian smoothing weight φη\varphi_\eta; the occupation indicators ηr,i,γ\eta^{r,i,\gamma} below always carry superscripts), the Borel σ\sigma-algebra B(Rd)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^d) and Lebesgue measure λd\lambda_d on Rd\mathbb{R}^d; the driving variables and the cell-count vector K\mathsf{K} on (Ω♭,F♭,P♭)(\Omega^\flat,\mathcal{F}^\flat,P^\flat); the copy clocks P♯\mathsf{P}^\sharp; the regularised recursion paths Σˉt♯,r(ω♭)\bar{\Sigma}^{\sharp,r}_t(\omega^\flat), the likelihoods ℓ♯,ω♭(r)\ell^{\sharp,\omega^\flat}(r) and the conflict-free set G♯\mathsf{G}^\sharp of claim 3 of that lemma; and the synthetic copy (Ω♯,F♯,μ♯)(\Omega^\sharp,\mathcal{F}^\sharp,\mu^\sharp) with Ω♯=Ω♭×Rd×R\Omega^\sharp=\Omega^\flat\times\mathbb{R}^d\times\mathbf{R}, F♯=(F♭⊗B(Rd))⊗R\mathcal{F}^\sharp=(\mathcal{F}^\flat\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^d))\otimes\mathcal{R}, and the record D(ω♭,θ,r)=r\mathsf{D}(\omega^\flat,\theta,r)=r. Integrals of [0,∞][0,\infty]-valued measurable maps are those of Lebesgue Integral of a Nonnegative Measurable Function, products being formed with the convention 0⋅∞=00\cdot\infty=0 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, and 1S\mathbf{1}_S denotes the indicator of a set SS.

Let moreover (Ω,F,P)(\Omega,\mathcal{F},P) be an NN-agent driving system with ll states and l~\tilde{l} observation channels, with expectation E\mathbb{E} (extended to [0,∞][0,\infty]-valued measurable maps as their integrals with respect to PP); let a solution of the controlled NN-agent dynamics on [0,T][0,T] for the policy hh and for the same data mm, A\mathcal{A}, β\beta, BB, β~\tilde{\beta}, B~\tilde{B} and TT be given, with regular event Ω0\Omega_0, empirical state measure Σt\Sigma_t and observation record WW; and fix reconstruction data (ηr,i,γ,σr,i,A~r,i,υ,G)(\eta^{r,i,\gamma},\sigma^{r,i},\tilde{A}^{r,i,\upsilon},G) for this driving system and policy, with reconstructed empirical state measures Σr\Sigma^r and, for each r∈Rr\in\mathbf{R}, the event Ωr\Omega^r of clause (d) of that lemma. Put D0={Σ0=x0}D_0=\{\Sigma_0=x_0\}.

Let Path=Path(GN,T)\mathsf{Path}=\mathsf{Path}(\mathbb{G}_N,T) be the space of piecewise constant paths in GN\mathbb{G}_N with horizon TT, with its σ\sigma-algebra C=CT\mathcal{C}=\mathcal{C}_T generated by the sets {p:p(u)=y}\{p:p(u)=y\} (u∈[0,T]u\in[0,T], y∈GNy\in\mathbb{G}_N), and write C⊗R\mathcal{C}\otimes\mathcal{R} for the product σ\sigma-algebra on Path×R\mathsf{Path}\times\mathbf{R}. Define Π\Pi on Ω\Omega, with values in the set of maps [0,T]→GN[0,T]\to\mathbb{G}_N (the empirical state measure Σu(ω)\Sigma_u(\omega) lies in GN\mathbb{G}_N for every ω\omega and uu, its coordinates being agent counts divided by NN), by Π(ω)(u)=Σu(ω)\Pi(\omega)(u)=\Sigma_u(\omega) for ω∈Ω0\omega\in\Omega_0 and Π(ω)(u)=x0\Pi(\omega)(u)=x_0 for ω∉Ω0\omega\notin\Omega_0; and define Π♯\Pi^\sharp on Ω♯\Omega^\sharp by Π♯(ω♭,θ,r)(u)=Σˉu♯,r(ω♭)\Pi^\sharp(\omega^\flat,\theta,r)(u)=\bar{\Sigma}^{\sharp,r}_u(\omega^\flat) (u∈[0,T]u\in[0,T]). Then:

1. (Measurability.) D0∈FD_0\in\mathcal{F}; Π\Pi and Π♯\Pi^\sharp take their values in Path\mathsf{Path} and are measurable with respect to F\mathcal{F}, respectively F♯\mathcal{F}^\sharp, and C\mathcal{C}; WW is measurable with respect to F\mathcal{F} and R\mathcal{R}, and D\mathsf{D} with respect to F♯\mathcal{F}^\sharp and R\mathcal{R}.

2. (Law identity for path and record.) For every F:Path×R→[0,∞]F:\mathsf{Path}\times\mathbf{R}\to[0,\infty] measurable with respect to C⊗R\mathcal{C}\otimes\mathcal{R},

E[1D0 F(Π,W)]=P(D0)∫Ω♯F(Π♯,D) dμ♯in [0,∞].\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_{D_0}\,F(\Pi,W)\bigr]=P(D_0)\int_{\Omega^\sharp}F(\Pi^\sharp,\mathsf{D})\,d\mu^\sharp\qquad\text{in }[0,\infty].

3. (Law identity for the aggregate at a fixed time and the record.) For every s∈[0,T]s\in[0,T] and every F′:GN×R→[0,∞]F':\mathbb{G}_N\times\mathbf{R}\to[0,\infty] measurable with respect to the product of the σ\sigma-algebra of all subsets of GN\mathbb{G}_N and R\mathcal{R},

E[1D0 F′(Σs,W)]=P(D0)∫Ω♯F′(Σˉs♯,D,D) dμ♯in [0,∞],\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_{D_0}\,F'(\Sigma_s,W)\bigr]=P(D_0)\int_{\Omega^\sharp}F'\bigl(\bar{\Sigma}^{\sharp,\mathsf{D}}_s,\mathsf{D}\bigr)\,d\mu^\sharp\qquad\text{in }[0,\infty],

where Σˉs♯,D(ω♭,θ,r)=Σˉs♯,r(ω♭)\bar{\Sigma}^{\sharp,\mathsf{D}}_s(\omega^\flat,\theta,r)=\bar{\Sigma}^{\sharp,r}_s(\omega^\flat). In particular, if P(D0)=1P(D_0)=1, the pair (Σs,W)(\Sigma_s,W) under PP and the pair (Σˉs♯,D,D)(\bar{\Sigma}^{\sharp,\mathsf{D}}_s,\mathsf{D}) under μ♯\mu^\sharp have the same image measure on the product of the σ\sigma-algebra of all subsets of GN\mathbb{G}_N and R\mathcal{R}.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…