Reason: S4.2 coercivity block per agreed design: exact completion-of-squares identity with a backward Riccati solution as hypothesis, explicit linearization error, and the a priori control bound with the mixed-moment perturbation term left explicit (rigorous form of the paper's asymptotic-coercivity step marked 'check this'). Internally reviewed; notation collisions resolved.
Statement
Adopt the full setting of the \reftext{thm:n-agent-cost-expansion-2026a}{second-order expansion of the N-agent cost}: the \reftext{def:n-agent-fluctuation-processes-2026a}{fluctuation processes} stβ, atβ of a \reftext{def:n-agent-controlled-dynamics-2026a}{solution} about a \reftext{def:mean-field-trajectory-pair-2026a}{mean-field trajectory pair} (S,A), the \reftext{def:c2-transition-rate-extension-2026a}{extension} (U,Ξ²Λβ) of Ξ² with derivative bound K and \reftext{def:extended-aggregate-state-drift-2026a}{extended aggregate state drift} bΛ, the \reftext{def:c2-population-cost-extension-2026a}{extension} of (L,G) - whose open set we here write Ucβ, so the extension is (Ucβ,LΛ,GΛ), freeing the letter V - a \reftext{def:stationary-mean-field-triple-2026a}{stationary co-state} P, the \reftext{def:fluctuation-lqg-cost-2026a}{fluctuation linear-quadratic cost} with Hessian coefficients Hijβ(t) and FΞ³Ξ΄β, the \reftext{def:n-agent-cost-2026a}{N-agent cost} JN[h], the \reftext{def:mean-field-cost-2026a}{mean-field cost} JMF=JMF[(S),(A)], the quantity ΞΆNβ, and the remainder RNβ of that theorem, under its hypothesis A=β«[0,T]βE[β£atββ£2]dt<β, with E the \reftext{def:expectation-variance-2026a}{expectation} and β£β β£ the Euclidean norm (\reftext{def:euclidean-distance-rn-2026a}{Euclidean distance} to the origin). Let Ξ be the \reftext{def:aggregate-fluctuation-covariance-2026a}{aggregate fluctuation covariance} of Ξ², and let Ξ=l(B+K)l(l+m)β and gsβ=Nβ(b(Ξ£sβ,Ξ±sβ)βb(Ssβ,Asβ)) be as in the \reftext{lem:fluctuation-state-moment-bound-2026a}{a priori second-moment bound}, b being the \reftext{def:aggregate-state-drift-2026a}{aggregate state drift} of Ξ². For real matrices with any index ranges we use entry notation: xβ My=βp,qβMpqxpyq over the matching index ranges (extending the square-matrix convention of the \reftext{lem:fluctuation-weighted-second-moment-2026a}{weighted second-moment evolution lemma}), (MMβ²)pq=βrβMprMβ²rq, and (MT)qp=Mpq. Define, for tβ[0,T]:
\textbf{Hypotheses.} \textbf{(H1)} There is a real r>0 with aβ Rtβaβ₯rβ£aβ£2 for every tβ[0,T] and aβRm; by (H1) and conclusion (a) below, whose proof uses only (H1), each Rtβ is invertible. \textbf{(H2)} There is a family Z=(Ztβ)tβ[0,T]β of symmetric real lΓl matrices, continuously differentiable in integral form as in the \reftext{lem:fluctuation-weighted-second-moment-2026a}{weighted second-moment evolution lemma}, whose densities are
under (H1) each Rtβ is \reftext{def:positive-semidefinite-matrix-2026a}{symmetric positive definite}, hence \reftext{lem:pd-inverse-2026a}{invertible}; and all entries of Etβ,Btβ,Qtβ,Vtβ,Rtβ,Rtβ1β,Wtβ, and Rtβ1βWtTβ are continuous in t (using the \reftext{lem:matrix-inverse-continuity-2026a}{continuity of the matrix inverse}), hence \reftext{lem:continuous-compact-interval-bounded-2026a}{bounded}: fix reals CZβ and CKβ with β£ZtΞ³Ξ΄ββ£β€CZβ and β£(Rtβ1βWtTβ)jΞ³β£β€CKβ for all indices and t.
Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective β they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.