Adopt the setting, hypotheses (H1)--(H2), and notation of the completion-of-squares theorem for the fluctuation cost: in particular the fluctuation processes st and at of a solution of the controlled N-agent dynamics about a mean-field trajectory pair (S,A), the symmetric positive definite matrices Rt (conclusion (a) of that theorem, under (H1)) with inverses Rt−1 (existing, symmetric, and positive definite), the Riccati family Z of (H2) with Wt=ZtBt+21Vt, the completed-square control deviation ut=at+Rt−1Wt⊤st, and the matrix entry notation x⋅My=∑p,qMpqxpyq, (MM′)pq=∑rMprM′rq, (M⊤)qp=Mpq. Let (Gt)t∈[0,T] be the observation filtration of the solution definition, as in the adaptedness lemma, and write E for the expectation.
Fix t∈[0,T] and assume that each component atj (j∈{1,…,m}) is square-integrable. Each component stγ is square-integrable, being a random variable with (stγ)2≤2N everywhere (the probability simplex having squared Euclidean diameter at most 2). By the existence and uniqueness theorem for conditional expectation, for each γ∈{1,…,l} there is a conditional expectation s^tγ of stγ given Gt; fix such a choice, write s^t=(s^t1,…,s^tl), and set εt=st−s^t componentwise. Then:
1. (Conditional-variance lower bound.) The random variables ut⋅Rtut and εt⋅(WtRt−1Wt⊤)εt are integrable, and
E[ut⋅Rtut] ≥ E[εt⋅(WtRt−1Wt⊤)εt].
2. (Trace form and independence of the choice.)
E[εt⋅(WtRt−1Wt⊤)εt]=γ=1∑lδ=1∑l(WtRt−1Wt⊤)γδE[εtγεtδ],
and each E[εtγεtδ] is unchanged if the conditional expectations s^tγ are replaced by any other conditional expectations of the stγ given Gt.