TheoremBase

Mean-Field-Side Data for the Van Trees Assembly: Regularity of the Drift Jacobian and Fluctuation Covariance Along a Trajectory Pair, the Fundamental-Solution Bound, the Profile Response and Its Restriction, and the Observation Information Matrix of the Fluctuation LQG Data

Statement

Data. Let l≥2l\ge2, m≥1m\ge1 and l~≥1\tilde{l}\ge1 be natural numbers, let A⊆Rm\mathcal{A}\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{m} be a nonempty subset of Euclidean space, let β\beta be a transition-rate family on ll states with control set A\mathcal{A} and rate bound B≥0B\ge0, let (U,V,βˉ)(U,V,\bar\beta) be a twice continuously differentiable extension of β\beta with derivative bound K≥0K\ge0, with the identification of Rl×Rm\mathbb{R}^{l}\times\mathbb{R}^{m} with Rl+m\mathbb{R}^{l+m}, the coordinates x1,…,xl+mx_{1},\dots,x_{l+m} of a point x=(Σ,α)x=(\Sigma,\alpha) and the partial derivatives ∂i\partial_{i}, all as in Twice Continuously Differentiable Extension of a Transition-Rate Family, let bˉ\bar{b} be the extended aggregate state drift of (U,V,βˉ)(U,V,\bar\beta), and let Θ\Theta be the aggregate fluctuation covariance of β\beta, an assignment of a real matrix Θ(Σ,α)\Theta(\Sigma,\alpha) with ll rows and ll columns to each point of Δl×A\Delta^{l}\times\mathcal{A}, Δl\Delta^{l} being the probability simplex. Let β~\tilde\beta be an observation-rate family on ll states with l~\tilde{l} channels and rate bound B~≥0\tilde{B}\ge0, let b~\tilde{b} be its aggregate observation drift, let (U~,β~ˉ)(\tilde{U},\bar{\tilde\beta}) be a twice continuously differentiable extension of β~\tilde\beta with derivative bound K~≥0\tilde{K}\ge0, and let b~ˉ\bar{\tilde{b}} be its extended aggregate observation drift, with the partial derivatives ∂γ\partial_{\gamma} (γ∈{1,…,l}\gamma\in\{1,\dots,l\}) on the open set U~⊆Rl\tilde{U}\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{l}. Assume

(OC) there is a real number b‾>0\underline{b}>0 with b~υ(Σ)≥b‾\tilde{b}^{\upsilon}(\Sigma)\ge\underline{b} for all Σ∈Δl\Sigma\in\Delta^{l} and all υ∈{1,…,l~}\upsilon\in\{1,\dots,\tilde{l}\}.

Let T>0T>0 be a real number, let (S,A)(S,A) be a mean-field trajectory pair for β\beta with horizon TT, with values St∈ΔlS_{t}\in\Delta^{l} and At∈AA_{t}\in\mathcal{A}, let ss be a real number with 0<s≤T0<s\le T (the intermediate time), and let λ\lambda assign to each u∈[0,T]u\in[0,T] a vector λ(u)∈Rl\lambda(u)\in\mathbb{R}^{l} with continuous components on [0,T][0,T] (the profile).

Conventions. Continuity of a real-valued function on a subinterval II of the real line means continuity on II relative to II, both II and the codomain R\mathbb{R} carrying the metric of the real line; for maps between subsets of Euclidean spaces, continuity at a point is that of Continuity at a Point for Maps Between Euclidean Spaces, and the two notions agree for real-valued maps by claim 1 of Euclidean Continuity Agrees with Metric Continuity for Real-Valued Functions. A real-valued function on [0,T][0,T] or on [0,s][0,s] is measurable when it is measurable with respect to the trace Borel σ\sigma-algebra of that interval and the Borel σ\sigma-algebra of the real line, and bounded measurable when moreover it is bounded; a map into Rl\mathbb{R}^{l} is (bounded) measurable when its components are. Integrals ∫[0,u]⋅ dr\int_{[0,u]}\cdot\,dr are Lebesgue integrals over compact intervals, taken componentwise for vector-valued integrands and equal to 00 when u=0u=0. Write ∣⋅∣|\cdot| for the Euclidean norm, x⋅yx\cdot y for the dot product, MzMz for the matrix-vector product, MM′MM' for the product of real matrices, M⊤M^{\top} for the transpose, InI_{n} for the identity matrix and M−1M^{-1} for the inverse of an invertible real square matrix; matrix entries are indexed with the row index first, and 1{υ=υ′}\mathbf{1}_{\{\upsilon=\upsilon'\}} denotes the indicator of the condition in braces (11 if it holds, 00 otherwise). The class CkC^{k} of a map on an open subset of a Euclidean space is that of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set. Finite sums over a finite index set are those of Sum over a Finite Index Set, independent of the enumeration by A Sum over a Finite Index Set Does Not Depend on the Enumeration.

The copy-side objects. For a transition label c=(σ0,γ0)c=(\sigma_{0},\gamma_{0}) (σ0≠γ0\sigma_{0}\ne\gamma_{0} in {1,…,l}\{1,\dots,l\}) let vc=δγ0−δσ0∈Rlv_{c}=\delta_{\gamma_{0}}-\delta_{\sigma_{0}}\in\mathbb{R}^{l}, where δ1,…,δl\delta_{1},\dots,\delta_{l} are the standard basis vectors of Rl\mathbb{R}^{l} as in Probability Simplex, let ψc:U×V→R\psi_{c}:U\times V\to\mathbb{R}, ψc(Σ,α)=Σσ0βˉ(σ0,γ0,Σ,α)\psi_{c}(\Sigma,\alpha)=\Sigma^{\sigma_{0}}\bar\beta(\sigma_{0},\gamma_{0},\Sigma,\alpha), be the label rate, and, wherever the partial derivatives exist, let gc(Σ,α)=(∂1ψc,…,∂lψc)(Σ,α)∈Rlg^{c}(\Sigma,\alpha)=(\partial_{1}\psi_{c},\dots,\partial_{l}\psi_{c})(\Sigma,\alpha)\in\mathbb{R}^{l} be the state gradient and E(Σ,α)\mathcal{E}(\Sigma,\alpha) the drift Jacobian, the real matrix with ll rows and ll columns and entries Eγη(Σ,α)=∑c∈Lvcγ ∂ηψc(Σ,α)\mathcal{E}^{\gamma\eta}(\Sigma,\alpha)=\sum_{c\in\mathcal{L}}v_{c}^{\gamma}\,\partial_{\eta}\psi_{c}(\Sigma,\alpha), the sum running over the set L\mathcal{L} of all transition labels; these are the objects so named in Shared-Clock Point Insertion into the Open-Loop Aggregate Solution: Exact Response Identity, Crude Bound, and Linearisation Defect, whose defining formulas involve only the extension (U,V,βˉ)(U,V,\bar\beta). For x∈Δlx\in\Delta^{l} and υ∈{1,…,l~}\upsilon\in\{1,\dots,\tilde{l}\} let gυ(x)=(∂1b~ˉυ(x),…,∂lb~ˉυ(x))∈Rlg_{\upsilon}(x)=(\partial_{1}\bar{\tilde{b}}^{\upsilon}(x),\dots,\partial_{l}\bar{\tilde{b}}^{\upsilon}(x))\in\mathbb{R}^{l} be the observation gradient and let D~(x)\tilde{D}(x) be the observation information matrix, the real matrix with ll rows and ll columns and entries

D~γδ(x)=∑υ=1l~∂γb~ˉυ(x) ∂δb~ˉυ(x)b~υ(x)(γ,δ∈{1,…,l}),\tilde{D}^{\gamma\delta}(x)=\sum_{\upsilon=1}^{\tilde{l}}\frac{\partial_{\gamma}\bar{\tilde{b}}^{\upsilon}(x)\,\partial_{\delta}\bar{\tilde{b}}^{\upsilon}(x)}{\tilde{b}^{\upsilon}(x)}\qquad(\gamma,\delta\in\{1,\dots,l\}),

the partial derivatives existing by claim (i) of Regularity and Derivative Bounds of the Extended Aggregate Observation Drift and the denominators being positive by (OC); these are the objects so named in the setting of Weighted Response and Pair-Exponent Quadratic Form on the Synthetic Copy: the Linearised Injection Equation, Comparison with the Profile Injection, and the Observation-Information Bound, whose defining formulas involve only b~ˉ\bar{\tilde{b}} and b~\tilde{b}.

The fluctuation LQG matrices. For t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T] let Et\mathcal{E}_{t}, Θt⋆\Theta^{\star}_{t}, E~t\tilde{\mathcal{E}}_{t} and Θ~t⋆\tilde{\Theta}^{\star}_{t} be the real matrices with entries

(Et)γδ=∂δbˉγ(St,At),(Θt⋆)γδ=Θγδ(St,At),(E~t)υγ=∂γb~ˉυ(St),(Θ~t⋆)υυ′=1{υ=υ′} b~υ(St),(\mathcal{E}_{t})_{\gamma\delta}=\partial_{\delta}\bar{b}^{\gamma}(S_{t},A_{t}),\qquad (\Theta^{\star}_{t})_{\gamma\delta}=\Theta^{\gamma\delta}(S_{t},A_{t}),\qquad (\tilde{\mathcal{E}}_{t})_{\upsilon\gamma}=\partial_{\gamma}\bar{\tilde{b}}^{\upsilon}(S_{t}),\qquad (\tilde{\Theta}^{\star}_{t})_{\upsilon\upsilon'}=\mathbf{1}_{\{\upsilon=\upsilon'\}}\,\tilde{b}^{\upsilon}(S_{t}),

for γ,δ∈{1,…,l}\gamma,\delta\in\{1,\dots,l\} and υ,υ′∈{1,…,l~}\upsilon,\upsilon'\in\{1,\dots,\tilde{l}\}, the partial derivatives of bˉ\bar{b} existing by claim (i) of Regularity and Derivative Bounds of the Extended Aggregate State Drift; these are, by their defining formulas, the state matrix, state noise covariance, observation matrix and observation noise covariance of the fluctuation LQG data in every instance of that definition whose transition-rate family, observation-rate family and both extensions are the present ones and whose pair (S,A)(S,A) is the present pair. The matrix Θ~t⋆\tilde{\Theta}^{\star}_{t} is invertible (claim 5); put D~t=E~t⊤((Θ~t⋆)−1E~t)\tilde{D}_{t}=\tilde{\mathcal{E}}_{t}^{\top}\bigl((\tilde{\Theta}^{\star}_{t})^{-1}\tilde{\mathcal{E}}_{t}\bigr). Notational cautions: AA with a time subscript is the control component of the pair, and the coefficient matrix of Variation of Constants with Bounded Measurable Forcing and the Two-Parameter Fundamental Solution, written AA there, is always written Er\mathcal{E}_{r} or Eu⋆\mathcal{E}^{\star}_{u} here; δ\delta as a matrix index (in D~γδ\tilde{D}^{\gamma\delta}, (Et)γδ(\mathcal{E}_{t})_{\gamma\delta} and similar entries) is unrelated to the basis vectors δ1,…,δl\delta_{1},\dots,\delta_{l}, which occur only inside vcv_{c}; D~(x)\tilde{D}(x) with a point of the simplex as argument is the copy-side matrix, D~t\tilde{D}_{t} with a time subscript the LQG matrix; E(Σ,α)\mathcal{E}(\Sigma,\alpha) with two arguments is the drift Jacobian, Et\mathcal{E}_{t} the state matrix; VV is the control-side open set of the extension; KK and K~\tilde{K} are derivative bounds; Λ\Lambda and M\mathsf{M} below are bounds for the profile and its response; A\mathcal{A} is the control set while As(λ)\mathcal{A}_{s}(\lambda) in claim 6 is a real number; and the label rates ψc\psi_{c} are unrelated to the profile response ψλ\psi_{\lambda} of claim 4.

Then the following hold.

1. (Regularity of the label rates and the drift Jacobian.) For every label cc the label rate ψc\psi_{c} is of class C2C^{2} on U×VU\times V; consequently gcg^{c} and E\mathcal{E} are defined at every point of U×VU\times V, every component of gcg^{c} and every entry Eγη\mathcal{E}^{\gamma\eta} is of class C1C^{1}, in particular continuous, on U×VU\times V, and

Eγη(x)=∂ηbˉγ(x)(x∈U×V, γ,η∈{1,…,l}).\mathcal{E}^{\gamma\eta}(x)=\partial_{\eta}\bar{b}^{\gamma}(x)\qquad(x\in U\times V,\ \gamma,\eta\in\{1,\dots,l\}).

2. (Continuity along the pair.) The map t↦(St,At)t\mapsto(S_{t},A_{t}) is continuous at every point of [0,T][0,T] as a map from [0,T]⊆R[0,T]\subseteq\mathbb{R} into Rl+m\mathbb{R}^{l+m}, with values in Δl×A⊆U×V\Delta^{l}\times\mathcal{A}\subseteq U\times V, and t↦Stt\mapsto S_{t} likewise into Rl\mathbb{R}^{l}, with values in Δl⊆U~\Delta^{l}\subseteq\tilde{U}. For all γ,δ,η∈{1,…,l}\gamma,\delta,\eta\in\{1,\dots,l\} and υ∈{1,…,l~}\upsilon\in\{1,\dots,\tilde{l}\} the functions

t↦Eγη(St,At)=(Et)γη,t↦Θγδ(St,At)=(Θt⋆)γδ,t↦∂γb~ˉυ(St)=(E~t)υγ,t↦b~υ(St)t\mapsto\mathcal{E}^{\gamma\eta}(S_{t},A_{t})=(\mathcal{E}_{t})_{\gamma\eta},\qquad t\mapsto\Theta^{\gamma\delta}(S_{t},A_{t})=(\Theta^{\star}_{t})_{\gamma\delta},\qquad t\mapsto\partial_{\gamma}\bar{\tilde{b}}^{\upsilon}(S_{t})=(\tilde{\mathcal{E}}_{t})_{\upsilon\gamma},\qquad t\mapsto\tilde{b}^{\upsilon}(S_{t})

are continuous on [0,T][0,T], the last one with values in [b‾,∞)[\underline{b},\infty); their restrictions to [0,s][0,s], as well as the components of the restrictions of SS and AA to [0,s][0,s], are continuous on [0,s][0,s], hence bounded measurable.

3. (The fundamental solution on [0,s][0,s].) The assignment u↦Eu⋆=E(Su,Au)u\mapsto\mathcal{E}^{\star}_{u}=\mathcal{E}(S_{u},A_{u}) (u∈[0,s]u\in[0,s]), which by claims 1 and 2 satisfies Eu⋆=Eu\mathcal{E}^{\star}_{u}=\mathcal{E}_{u}, has continuous entries on [0,s][0,s], so that the setting of Variation of Constants with Bounded Measurable Forcing and the Two-Parameter Fundamental Solution is instantiated with k=lk=l, horizon ss and coefficient matrix E⋆\mathcal{E}^{\star}; let ΦE(t,u)\Phi^{\mathcal{E}}(t,u) (t,u∈[0,s]t,u\in[0,s]) be its two-parameter fundamental solution. There is a real number Φˉ≥0\bar\Phi\ge0 with

∣ΦE(t,u) y∣≤Φˉ2 ∣y∣(t,u∈[0,s], y∈Rl).|\Phi^{\mathcal{E}}(t,u)\,y|\le\bar\Phi^{2}\,|y|\qquad(t,u\in[0,s],\ y\in\mathbb{R}^{l}).

4. (The profile response.) There is a real number Λ≥0\Lambda\ge0 with ∣λ(u)∣≤Λ|\lambda(u)|\le\Lambda for every u∈[0,T]u\in[0,T]. There is exactly one bounded measurable map ψλ:[0,T]→Rl\psi_{\lambda}:[0,T]\to\mathbb{R}^{l} such that

ψλ(u)=∫[0,u](Er ψλ(r)+Θr⋆ λ(r)) dr(u∈[0,T]);\psi_{\lambda}(u)=\int_{[0,u]}\bigl(\mathcal{E}_{r}\,\psi_{\lambda}(r)+\Theta^{\star}_{r}\,\lambda(r)\bigr)\,dr\qquad(u\in[0,T]);

its components are continuous on [0,T][0,T], and there is a real number M≥0\mathsf{M}\ge0 with ∣ψλ(u)∣≤M|\psi_{\lambda}(u)|\le\mathsf{M} for every u∈[0,T]u\in[0,T]. Let ϖ\varpi and ψˉ\bar\psi be the restrictions of λ\lambda and of ψλ\psi_{\lambda} to [0,s][0,s], with values ϖu=λ(u)\varpi_{u}=\lambda(u) and ψˉu=ψλ(u)\bar\psi_{u}=\psi_{\lambda}(u). Then ϖ\varpi and ψˉ\bar\psi have continuous, hence bounded measurable, components on [0,s][0,s], ∣ϖu∣≤Λ|\varpi_{u}|\le\Lambda and ∣ψˉu∣≤M|\bar\psi_{u}|\le\mathsf{M} for u∈[0,s]u\in[0,s],

ψˉu=∫[0,u](E(Sr,Ar) ψˉr+Θ(Sr,Ar) ϖr) dr(u∈[0,s]),\bar\psi_{u}=\int_{[0,u]}\bigl(\mathcal{E}(S_{r},A_{r})\,\bar\psi_{r}+\Theta(S_{r},A_{r})\,\varpi_{r}\bigr)\,dr\qquad(u\in[0,s]),

and ψˉ\bar\psi is the only bounded measurable map [0,s]→Rl[0,s]\to\mathbb{R}^{l} satisfying this equation.

5. (The observation information matrix.) For every t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T] the matrix Θ~t⋆\tilde{\Theta}^{\star}_{t} is invertible, its inverse being the matrix with entries 1{υ=υ′}/b~υ(St)\mathbf{1}_{\{\upsilon=\upsilon'\}}/\tilde{b}^{\upsilon}(S_{t}); D~t\tilde{D}_{t} is a real matrix with ll rows and ll columns with entries

(D~t)γδ=∑υ=1l~∂γb~ˉυ(St) ∂δb~ˉυ(St)b~υ(St)=D~γδ(St),(\tilde{D}_{t})_{\gamma\delta}=\sum_{\upsilon=1}^{\tilde{l}}\frac{\partial_{\gamma}\bar{\tilde{b}}^{\upsilon}(S_{t})\,\partial_{\delta}\bar{\tilde{b}}^{\upsilon}(S_{t})}{\tilde{b}^{\upsilon}(S_{t})}=\tilde{D}^{\gamma\delta}(S_{t}),

so that D~t=D~(St)\tilde{D}_{t}=\tilde{D}(S_{t}) and (D~t)γδ=(D~t)δγ(\tilde{D}_{t})_{\gamma\delta}=(\tilde{D}_{t})_{\delta\gamma}; and for every z∈Rlz\in\mathbb{R}^{l},

z⋅(D~tz)=∑υ=1l~(gυ(St)⋅z)2b~υ(St) ≥ 0.z\cdot(\tilde{D}_{t}z)=\sum_{\upsilon=1}^{\tilde{l}}\frac{(g_{\upsilon}(S_{t})\cdot z)^{2}}{\tilde{b}^{\upsilon}(S_{t})}\ \ge\ 0 .

Moreover, for all γ,δ\gamma,\delta, the function t↦(D~t)γδt\mapsto(\tilde{D}_{t})_{\gamma\delta} is continuous on [0,T][0,T], with ∣(D~t)γδ∣≤l~ (B~+K~)2/b‾|(\tilde{D}_{t})_{\gamma\delta}|\le\tilde{l}\,(\tilde{B}+\tilde{K})^{2}/\underline{b}.

6. (The information functional and its two-integral form.) The functions r↦λ(r)⋅(Θr⋆λ(r))r\mapsto\lambda(r)\cdot(\Theta^{\star}_{r}\lambda(r)) and r↦ψλ(r)⋅(D~rψλ(r))r\mapsto\psi_{\lambda}(r)\cdot(\tilde{D}_{r}\psi_{\lambda}(r)) are continuous and nonnegative on [0,T][0,T], the second with values at most l~ l2 (B~+K~)2M2/b‾\tilde{l}\,l^{2}\,(\tilde{B}+\tilde{K})^{2}\mathsf{M}^{2}/\underline{b}. Consequently

As(λ)=∫[0,s](λ(r)⋅(Θr⋆λ(r))+ψλ(r)⋅(D~rψλ(r))) dr\mathcal{A}_{s}(\lambda)=\int_{[0,s]}\Bigl(\lambda(r)\cdot\bigl(\Theta^{\star}_{r}\lambda(r)\bigr)+\psi_{\lambda}(r)\cdot\bigl(\tilde{D}_{r}\psi_{\lambda}(r)\bigr)\Bigr)\,dr

is a well-defined real number, and

As(λ)=∫[0,s]ϖr⋅(Θ(Sr,Ar)ϖr) dr+∫[0,s]ψˉr⋅(D~(Sr)ψˉr) dr,\mathcal{A}_{s}(\lambda)=\int_{[0,s]}\varpi_{r}\cdot\bigl(\Theta(S_{r},A_{r})\varpi_{r}\bigr)\,dr+\int_{[0,s]}\bar\psi_{r}\cdot\bigl(\tilde{D}(S_{r})\bar\psi_{r}\bigr)\,dr,

both integrands being continuous, nonnegative and bounded on [0,s][0,s], both integrals being nonnegative, and hence As(λ)≥0\mathcal{A}_{s}(\lambda)\ge0. (The first integral is the profile energy P\mathcal{P} of Closeness to a Mean-Field Pair on the Synthetic Copy: Clock Discrepancy, Gronwall Comparison of the Weighted Response with the Profile Response, and the Observation-Information Bound with Mean-Field Data in any instance of its setting with horizon ss, comparison pair (S,A)∣[0,s](S,A)|_{[0,s]} and profile ϖ\varpi.)

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…